WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIVALleader in pioneering action in Central Africa (wa Musiti, 2002). It has facilitatedCEFDHAC (Central African Moist Forest Ecosystems), which assists collaboration ofconcerned groups in the Central African region. IUCN-ROCA has also circuated a GlobalEnvironment Fund/United Nations Development Program (GEF/UNDP) proposal <strong>for</strong>implementing management strategies and instituting alternatives to bushmeat (waMusiti, 2002). Collaboration of IUCN-ROCA with the UN Food and AgricultureOrganisation (FAO) and CITES Bushmeat Working Group has assisted in developmentof a National Bushmeat Action Plan and establishment of the Central African WorldHeritage Forest Initiative (CAWHFI).In 2001, the Congolese government’s Ministry of Forestry Economy stipulated thatall <strong>for</strong>est concessions operating in Northern Congo were to develop and fund wildlifemanagement programmes (Elkan, 2002). In 2002, it proposed the design,implementation and monitoring of standardised guidelines <strong>for</strong> achieving this.In February 2005, leaders of seven Central African nations signed a treaty to establishcross-border partnerships to help save the Congo Basin. Striving <strong>for</strong> protection againstillegal logging, poaching and the ivory and bushmeat trades, the project is relying on a60% contribution from international aid. The total projected budget <strong>for</strong> 2004 – 2013 ise1.25 billion. So far, only France and the US have contributed, donating e50 millionand $53 million respectively (Gouala, 2005).Five African Presidents have also talked about creating a megapark in West Africa.(Black, 2004).In September 2005, a ‘Strategie et Plan d’Action pour la Survie des Grandes Singesen Republique Democratique du Congo’ was produced after a national workshop andextensive consultation with stake-holders, <strong>for</strong>ming the basis <strong>for</strong> government policyin relation to all great apes and their habitats in the Democratic Republic of Congo.5.1.1.2 USAThe US led in facilitating the historic launch of the Congo Basin Forest Partnership(CBFP) at the World Summit of Sustainable Development in Johannesburg, South Africa,in 2002. CBFP comprises 29 partners, including 15 governments, 7 NGOs, 2 industryassociations and 5 international organisations (McAlpine & Roth, 2002). The USDepartment of State, US Agency <strong>for</strong> International Development (USAID) and the UnitedStates Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) have supported the CITES Bushmeat WorkingGroup and Bushmeat Crisis Task Force (BCTF, 2004c).The USFWS’s Division of International Conservation (DIC) is involved in project supportthroughout sub-Saharan Africa (Ruggeiro, 2002). The USFWS administers fourmultinational species conservation funds, which include the African ElephantConservation Fund (AfECF), The Great Ape Conservation Fund (GACF) and theRhinoceros and Tiger Conservation Fund. Together with USAID’s Central AfricanProgram <strong>for</strong> the Environment (CARPE), the USFWS uses these funds to assist Africangovernments, NGOs and conservationists to address the bushmeat crisis. This includesthe Noubabalé-Ndoki National Park (NNNP) partnership in the Republic of Congo, whichis becoming a model <strong>for</strong> international government collaboration (Ruggiero, 2002).CARPE also provides support <strong>for</strong> gorilla conservation in Central Africa (BCTF, 2002).The US Forest Service (USFS), a CARPE partner, has also been instrumental insupporting bushmeat work and providing support <strong>for</strong> various symposia throughout1990 – 2002 (BCTF, 2002). Other US institutions, including the Subcommittee onFisheries Conservation, Wildlife and Oceans, and US Department of the Interior,have been involved in bushmeat symposia (BCTF, 2002).5.1.1.3 EuropeIn March 1996, a resolution drawn up by the World Society <strong>for</strong> the Protection ofAnimals (WSPA) was passed at the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group and EuropeanUnion (ACP-EU) joint assembly in Namibia, calling <strong>for</strong> political action to end hunting andkilling of apes <strong>for</strong> food in Central and West Africa. However, this did not succeed inreaching political agendas.In 2001, European zoos participated in an extensive campaign initiated by theEuropean Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA) and the International Fund <strong>for</strong> AnimalWelfare (IFAW). A resulting petition against the illegal bushmeat trade, signed by 1.9million people, was presented to European Parliament in January 2002, resulting ina resolution being passed in January 2004.5.1.1.4 UKGovernment action in the UK, as at February 2005, has been described by theParliamentary Office of Science and Technology (Kümpel, 2005) and is outlined herein summary.ACTIONS ONGOING63WSPA/APE ALLIANCE62Below: Eland andelephants arespecies hunted<strong>for</strong> their meat.© David Sheldrick Wildlife Trust© Ian Redmond
WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIVALThe Department <strong>for</strong> Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) is the UK governmentdepartment involved with bushmeat. Defra proposed the creation of the CITESBushmeat Working Group (CITES BWG) in 2000 and has since contributed funds tosupport this. It has also funded the UK Tropical Forest Forum’s Bushmeat WorkingGroup (UK-TFF-BWG). It funds the Darwin Initiative, which is currently involved in threebushmeat projects, as well as funding a separate UK-based bushmeat research project.Defra, together with the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO), has contributed morethan £500,000 to GRASP (the UNEP/UNESCO Great Ape <strong>Survival</strong> Project).In 2002, a new Imported Food Division was established within the Food Standards Agency(FSA) to address public health issues in the context of imported food. In the same year, theUK Bushmeat Campaign was launched, a coalition of more than 30 conservationorganisations led by Barry Gardiner, Member of Parliament (MP), and Robert Evans, Memberof European Parliament (MEP). This campaign seeks to mainstream awareness of thebushmeat trade among international <strong>for</strong>ums and consumers of timber and mining products.In April 2003, Her Majesty’s Customs and Excise (HMCE) acquired responsibility <strong>for</strong>anti-smuggling controls of wildlife products at all borders. HMCE is expected to receive£25 million in ministerial support during the first three years of this responsibility.The National Audit Office plans to publish findings of a study to determine progress,constraints and the capacity of HMCE to detect and mitigate illegal meat imports.A UK parliamentary Early Day motion on bushmeat in 2003 was the third most popularin that session, receiving 322 signatures.In 2004, CITES parties called upon the UN Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO)to organise a workshop <strong>for</strong> developing new international strategies <strong>for</strong> addressing thebushmeat crisis. The creation of the Inter-departmental Ministerial Group on Biodiversityfollowed in the same year, including among its members Defra ministers, theDepartment <strong>for</strong> International Development (DFID) and FCO.The UK had a presence at the 2004 African Forest Law En<strong>for</strong>cement and Governance(AFLEG) conference and was one of 40 countries to sign a ministerial declaration onillegal logging, including measures to mitigate bushmeat hunting.Since the mid-1990s, DFID has been negotiating poverty reduction strategy papers withcentral governments and providing funding <strong>for</strong> their implementation. But wildlife isseldom regarded by partner governments as a mechanism <strong>for</strong> alleviating poverty andis rarely included in these strategies (DFID, 2002).5.1.1.5 InternationalThe World Conservation Union (IUCN) adopted a resolution on bushmeat in October2000, calling <strong>for</strong> increased funding, law en<strong>for</strong>cement and collaboration to help curb thecrisis (wa Musiti, 2002).5.1.2 Private sectorInternational media attention has encouraged some multinational logging companiesto collaborate with NGOs and install pilot activities to reduce the impact of logging onwildlife (Tutin et al, 2001, cited by Nasi, 2001). Many companies are beginning to altertheir practices and management policies to reduce both direct and indirect impacts onbiodiversity (BCTF, 2000b).The Zoological Society of London (ZSL) and Timbnet (the UK’s leading hardwood trader)are planning to pilot a project in a Ghana concession to evaluate the feasibility of‘bushmeat stewardship’. It would be expensive, but Timbnet argue that public moneycould support early production until consumer demand has increased to absorb the cost.In 1999, the World Conservation Society (WCS) began collaborating with the loggingindustry (Congolese Industrielle des Bois (CIB)) and the government of the Republic ofCongo to preserve wildlife in four concessions within Nouabalé-Ndoki National Park (NNNP).CIB’s administration fostered prohibitions on the hunting of protected species and theexportation of bushmeat from its concessions, as well as establishing no-hunting areas,buffer zones and community hunting zones (Elkan, 2002). Under the auspices of theMinistry of Forestry Economy, ecoguards were recruited from local communities,sentries established at trafficking points and regular patrols mobilised throughout thepark (Elkan, 2002). In addition, the project has conducted surveys of consumer tasteand market preference and implemented a system of beef importation, tilapiaproduction and chicken farming, as well as the provision of food by CIB to its work<strong>for</strong>ce.Over the first two and a half years of the project, wildlife management was extended tomore than 500,000ha in a 1 million ha concession (Elkan, 2002). Protection has beencostly but effective. In the first two years, a 10-fold reduction in snaring was observed,and 160 prosecutions made (Elkan, 2002). Funding has been received from theRepublic of Congo government, WCS, USAID, the Central African Regional Program <strong>for</strong>the Environment (CARPE), the International Tropical Timber Organisation (ITTO), USFWSand Columbus Zoo among others.More recently, Global Forest Watch (GFW), World Resources Institute (WRI), WorldConservation Union (IUCN) and Interafrican Forest Industries Association (IFIA) haveestablished the Forest Concession Monitoring System <strong>for</strong> Central Africa (FORCOMS).This system of independent, voluntary monitoring of concessions in Central Africa iscurrently in its first operational phase (IFIA, 2005) and aims to work with pro-active<strong>for</strong>est companies to ensure their operations con<strong>for</strong>m to regulations and sustainablemanagement. WRI-GFW carried out their first mission to Cameroon in November andDecember 2004 and anticipate missions in the Republic of Congo and Gabon during2005. More than 35 <strong>for</strong>est enterprises have already subscribed to the initiative (IFIA,2005). A schedule of aims, activities and context of the initiative was published in2004 (Beck & Méthot, 2004).ACTIONS ONGOING65WSPA/APE ALLIANCE64
- Page 1 and 2: Recipes for Survival:Controlling th
- Page 3 and 4: 3.4. The effects of bushmeat huntin
- Page 5 and 6: 8RECIPES FOR SURVIVALExecutive Summ
- Page 7 and 8: WSPA/APE ALLIANCE12RECIPES FOR SURV
- Page 9 and 10: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 11 and 12: THE BROADER BUSHMEAT ISSUEThe broad
- Page 13 and 14: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 15 and 16: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 17 and 18: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 19 and 20: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 21 and 22: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 23 and 24: Primate bushmeat:current situation4
- Page 25 and 26: RECIPES FOR SURVIVALPRIMATE BUSHMEA
- Page 27 and 28: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 29 and 30: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 31: Actions ongoing andtheir effectiven
- Page 35 and 36: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 37 and 38: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 39 and 40: OBSTACLES TO CHANGEObstacles to cha
- Page 41 and 42: POTENTIAL SOLUTIONSPotential soluti
- Page 43 and 44: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 45 and 46: RECIPES FOR SURVIVALSupport for cer
- Page 47 and 48: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 49 and 50: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 51 and 52: RECIPES FOR SURVIVALto hunters and
- Page 53 and 54: RECIPES FOR SURVIVALAPPENDIXWSPA/AP
- Page 55 and 56: 108RECIPES FOR SURVIVAL.Organisatio
- Page 57 and 58: Gouala, J. (2005). Forum breathes l
- Page 59 and 60: Redmond, I. (2001) Coltan Boom, Gor
- Page 61 and 62: Muntiacus vuquangensis GIANT MUNTJA
- Page 63 and 64: Pteropus ornatus ORNATE FLYING FOXP
- Page 65 and 66: Miopithecus talapoin talapoin (W&C)
- Page 67 and 68: Myosciurus pumilio African pygmy sq
- Page 69 and 70: Ducula oceanica MICRONESIAN IMPERIA
- Page 71 and 72: Alectoris chukar Chukar partridgeAl
- Page 73 and 74: Pelecanus rufescens Pink-backed pel
- Page 75 and 76: Sacalia quadriocellata Four-eyed tu
- Page 77 and 78: Rana fukienensisRana grahamiRana gu
- Page 79 and 80: Rhynchophorus ferrugineus papuanusR
- Page 81 and 82: Hypoderma bovisOedemagena tarandiRh
- Page 83 and 84:
Ugada giovanninaUgada limbalisUgada
- Page 85 and 86:
PolybiaPolybia diguetanaPolybia ign
- Page 87 and 88:
Anaphe venataAntheua insignataDesme
- Page 89 and 90:
Acrida giganteaAcrida lataAcrida su
- Page 91 and 92:
PhasmatodeaPhasmatidaeEurycantha ho
- Page 93 and 94:
DD South and South and SE AsiaLR/lc
- Page 95 and 96:
VU A2c OceaniaVU A2b+3d Sub-Saharan
- Page 97 and 98:
LR/lc Sub-Saharan AfricaLR/lc Sub-S
- Page 99 and 100:
DD Sub-Saharan AfricaLC Sub-Saharan
- Page 101 and 102:
NT OceaniaVU B1ab(ii,iii,iv,v) Sout
- Page 103 and 104:
LC South and SE AsiaLC EuropeVU A2c
- Page 105 and 106:
LC Sub-Saharan AfricaCR D MesoAmeri
- Page 107 and 108:
EN A1d+2d South and SE AsiaVU A1cd+
- Page 109 and 110:
LC South and SE AsiaNT East Asia, S
- Page 111 and 112:
OceaniaMesoAmerica, Carribbean Isla
- Page 113 and 114:
North AmericaNorth AmericaNorth Ame
- Page 115 and 116:
Sub-Saharan AfricaSub-Saharan Afric
- Page 117 and 118:
MesoAmericaMesoAmericaSouth America
- Page 119 and 120:
Sub-Saharan AfricaSub-Saharan Afric
- Page 121 and 122:
West/Central AsiaEast AsiaSub-Sahar
- Page 123 and 124:
OceaniaOceaniaOceaniaSouth and SE A
- Page 125 and 126:
Papio cynocephalus Yellow baboon LR
- Page 127 and 128:
Berggorilla & Regenwald Stuttgart Z
- Page 129 and 130:
Bushmeat Crisis TaskForceJGI Africa
- Page 131 and 132:
COMIFAC (Council ofMinisters for Fo
- Page 133 and 134:
EAZA EAZA, IFAW EAZA Petition again
- Page 135 and 136:
Heifer International South West Far
- Page 137 and 138:
IUCN Conservation Breeding Speciali
- Page 139 and 140:
MINEF Anti-poaching unit CameroonMi
- Page 141 and 142:
Philadelphia Zoo Bushmeat Education
- Page 143 and 144:
TRAFFIC Review of bushmeat trade in
- Page 145 and 146:
WCS WCS Determining economics ofbus
- Page 147 and 148:
WCS, Bronx Zoo WCS Pattycake Fund W
- Page 149 and 150:
Wildlife Conservation Society, Amer
- Page 151 and 152:
WWF ? Vision for Biodiversity in Co
- Page 153 and 154:
Categories Keywords Dates Contact U
- Page 155 and 156:
Surveys, Research,Community Researc
- Page 157 and 158:
Funding, Research1995 - presentFund
- Page 159 and 160:
Livelihoods, Poverty,2002 Joanna El
- Page 161 and 162:
Coltan, MiningInformation , Educati
- Page 163 and 164:
Policy making, Exchangeinfo, Discus
- Page 165 and 166:
Awareness, Timber,Furniture, Coltan
- Page 167 and 168:
Bushmeat, Trade,Methodologies,Educa
- Page 169 and 170:
Self-sufficiency, Foodsecurity,Food
- Page 171 and 172:
Bushmeat, Utilization,Sustainabilit
- Page 173 and 174:
Population, Density,Foods, Research
- Page 175 and 176:
Law enforcement,Hunting, Densities,
- Page 177 and 178:
Campaigning, Primates,Apes, Awarene
- Page 179 and 180:
Research, Modeling,Birds, Fish, Pri
- Page 181 and 182:
Cameroon governmentMINEF Cameroon M
- Page 183 and 184:
Gorilla HavenGov CongoGov. Cameroon
- Page 185 and 186:
Peace CorpsPeopleandPlanet.netPercy
- Page 187 and 188:
Wisconsin Primate Research Center (
- Page 189 and 190:
11111412131116121112121124121916111
- Page 191 and 192:
122111112 Governments of Republic o
- Page 193 and 194:
2114111122 Primate Conservation1311
- Page 195:
286 World Resources Institute (WRI)