WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIVAL3.4.4 Species at riskAfrican <strong>for</strong>est hunters generally favour duikers and primates, but opportunistic huntingof carnivores also occurs and can be economically significant, <strong>for</strong> example the trade inleopard skins (Ray, Stein & BCTF, 2002). Forest carnivores such as leopards, golden cats,crowned eagles and snakes rely on bushmeat-hunted species <strong>for</strong> prey, and thus the tradealso affects them indirectly (Wilkie & Eves, 2001; Apaza et al, 2002). The ecologicalimpact of carnivore relative to herbivore loss may be considerable because of carnivores’low densities, low reproductive rates and trophic rankings (Ray, Stein & BCTF, 2002).Duikers represent a major proportion of bushmeat hunted <strong>for</strong> subsistence and trade,principally because they are large and abundant and easy to trap with wire snares(BCTF, 2003). 28 million bay duikers and 16 million blue duikers are killed in CentralAfrica each year (Wilkie & Carpenter, 1999). In Liberia, three quarters of the bushmeatharvest comprises duikers (Bowen-Jones & Pendry, 1999). Duikers are currentlyestimated to comprise 40 – 80% of meat available in Central African markets, andsignificant population declines have been observed in West Africa, where habitat losshas rein<strong>for</strong>ced commercial hunting (Eves, Stein & BCTF, 2002).Though populations are hard to observe and monitor in the wild, duikers are easilyhunted with guns and snares and are transportable on foot (Eves, Stein & BCTF, 2002).Hunted populations are replenished by individuals migrating from undisturbed areas,thus disguising the effects of unsustainable harvesting. But as logging activities swallowup undisturbed areas, populations that can seemingly tolerate hunting will begin tosuffer (Eves, Stein & BCTF, 2002). Extinction of several duiker species is alreadyconsidered imminent, and the repercussions could be catastrophic <strong>for</strong> the predator andtree species that rely on them <strong>for</strong> their survival and seed dispersal (Eves, Stein & BCTF,2002). Low reproductive rates and territorial behaviour eliminate the potential <strong>for</strong>husbandry (Eves, Stein & BCTF, 2002).Rodents are also hunted <strong>for</strong> bushmeat, particularly where other, more charismaticTHE BROADER BUSHMEAT ISSUEspecies have been depleted by overhunting (Eves et al, 2002). Unlike the larger,preferred species, rodents have high reproductive rates and are adaptable to conditionsof human disturbance and cultivation. Though the amount of meat per carcass is small,the abundance of rodents means they can be hunted in greater numbers to compensate<strong>for</strong> the lack of larger game. Rodents there<strong>for</strong>e represent a viable subsistence base. Inmany cases, rodents are nutritionally superior to bigger species (Barnett, 2000).In Equatorial Guinea, rodents were found to comprise 32% of meat at markets (50%when pooled with blue duiker Cephalophus monticola) (Fa et al, 1995; Juste et al,1995). Where there are significant duiker populations supplying the bulk of bushmeat tomarkets, rodent hunting is opportunistic, but local extinctions have occurred whereoverpopulation and overhunting have already depleted the larger, more marketablespecies (Stein et al, 2002a). Giant pouched rats and greater cane rats have sufferedpopulation extinctions even where laws require that hunters hold licences <strong>for</strong> killingunprotected rodents (Stein et al, 2002a). Human consumption of rodents is linked toLassa fever, a viral illness whose reservoir is the multi-mammate rat Mastomys sp.Nevertheless, a preference <strong>for</strong> rodents over beef in some markets <strong>for</strong>tifies proposals<strong>for</strong> cane rat domestication and farming to provide an alternative source of nutritiousprotein. The percentage of rodents and ungulates in the offtake could be used toindicate site over-exploitation (rodents indicate reduced availability of larger, morecharismatic species).Elephant bushmeat is further cause <strong>for</strong> concern. Some authors have reported localextinctions as a result of hunting (Bowen-Jones & Pendry, 1999). The ivory trade andslow maturation and reproductive rates make elephants especially vulnerable to overexploitationfrom commercial hunting (Stein & BCTF, 2001, Draulans & Van Krunkelsven,2002). One outcome of this is decreasing tusk size and subsequent loss of profit fromthe ivory trade, encouraging the commercialisation of meat use to recover earnings(Eves & Ruggiero, 2000). Elephant hunting has recently been particularly severe inCentral Africa (Wasser et al, 2004), where the meat and tusks of 273 elephants killedduring four months in 1995 – 1996 sold <strong>for</strong> US$400 per animal (Stein & BCTF, 2001).The Monitoring of Illegal Killing in Elephants program (MIKE) emphasised at CITES (11thConference of the Parties) that, in some instances, tusks appeared to be a secondaryby-product to the bushmeat trade, though some research has suggested otherwise(Raffaele, 2005).The current range of African elephants lies largely outside protected areas, makingthem yet more susceptible to illegal hunting and encroachment, particularly in Centraland Eastern Africa, where political unrest has motivated the presence of illegalweapons (Eves & Ruggiero, 2000). Refugees also intensify demand.Twenty five percent of birds in the order Galli<strong>for</strong>mes are at risk from extinction, partlydue to the extent to which they are over-hunted (McGowan & Garson, 2002).Galli<strong>for</strong>mes provide one of the most important sources of avian protein in subsistence39WSPA/APE ALLIANCE© David Sheldrick Wildlife Trust38Right: Snaringaffects manyspeciesindiscriminately:Lesser kudu caughtin Tsavo NationalPark, Kenya
WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIVALdiets, not least because they are principally large, ground-dwelling birds and can occurat high densities.Almost all Asian turtles (as well as tortoises and terrapins) are hunted and bartered<strong>for</strong> consumption, medicine and the pet trade (the only species left unreported are eitherexceptionally rare or believed extinct) (TRAFFIC, 1999). Softshell turtles command thehighest price per kilogram (up to six times that of lamb or chicken in India) and smallerindividuals are preferred because they have a higher proportion of cartilage andgelatinous skin and can be served whole in restaurants (TRAFFIC, 1999). Behler(1997) cites research from McCord that suggests one specimen of Cuora trifasciata isworth $10,000. Most meat is exported, with estimates of volume ranging from 50,000turtles daily (Behler, 1997) to 12 million annually (Salzberg, 1998). Wai-Neng Lau et al.(1998) described a 25-fold increase in turtles being imported to Hong Kong between1977 and 1996.Primates are among the most highly endangered species hunted <strong>for</strong> the bushmeattrade and are considered in section 4.3.4.5 OutlookTropical <strong>for</strong>ests are relatively unproductive ecosystems and are more vulnerable toexploitation than other habitat types (Kümpel, 2005; Fa et al, 2005). Though intuitively,we might expect gradual declines in wildlife as a result of over-hunting, research hasshown that a sudden, unexpected collapse of <strong>for</strong>est populations is more likely – theboom-and-bust situation observed in some fisheries (Barnes, 2002). It is unlikely thatgovernments will tackle the bushmeat problem during the boom phase of goodharvests – they won’t perceive a problem until it’s too late (Barnes, 2002). Stochasticfactors such as low food availability or disease and other environmental catastrophesare circumstances in which such a collapse might be instigated (Barnes, 2002).Large herbivores, large carnivores and most primates are unlikely to persist inpermanently settled, multiple-use zones around national parks unless hunting isrestricted. Only small, rapidly reproducing animals such as rodents and small antelopesare likely to withstand the pressure from commercial hunting (Wilkie & Eves, 2001).3.5 Bushmeat supply, demand and price dynamics3.5.1 SupplyA recent study has shown that, in Ghana, people have increased their reliance onbushmeat as a result of depleted fish stocks, facilitated in part by EU-subsidised fleetsoperating in the region (Brashares et al, 2004). This has consequently led to abruptpopulation declines in 41 mammal species.Investigating the operation of a bushmeat commodity chain in Takoradi, Ghana, showedTHE BROADER BUSHMEAT ISSUEthat the primary trade route was from commercial hunters (who received the largestfinancial benefits), via wholesalers to chopbars (cafés) (Cowlishaw et al, 2005).In several countries across east and southern Africa, including Kenya and Malawi, illegalbrew bars are a plat<strong>for</strong>m <strong>for</strong> trading bushmeat, since they satisfy the need <strong>for</strong> secretcommerce (Barnett, 2000). Direct house-to-house sales are also popular, and somehunters and traders operate with contracts to <strong>for</strong>tify confidentiality (Barnett, 2000).Bushmeat trade is more open in areas with less adequate law en<strong>for</strong>cement, includingMozambique (Barnett, 2000) and the Central and West African region.3.5.2 DemandWealthier inhabitants of urban areas are willing to pay more <strong>for</strong> bushmeat, which isperceived as a luxury product and a way of retaining cultural links to a traditional villagelifestyle (Barnett, 2000). People living in urban areas eat bushmeat out of preference, ratherthan necessity, and decrease the supply available to those who need it most (ABCG, 2004).Consumer demand can be decreased by:• Changing consumer preferences and tastes• Decreasing the price of substitutes and increasing availability• Increasing the price of bushmeatChanging preferences through environmental education is only likely to have an effectin areas where bushmeat is consumed as a luxury item, <strong>for</strong> example in urban areas(urban elites, restaurants and expatriates) rather than rural areas, where fewsubstitutes are available.Increasing the price of bushmeat could be achieved by decreasing the supply throughlaw en<strong>for</strong>cement (Wilkie and Carpenter, 1999), but unless there are substitutesavailable, a price increase would bolster economic incentives <strong>for</strong> hunting.3.5.3 PriceIt has been suggested that the practice of eating bushmeat is entrenched in some culturesand inherently preferred over domestic meat, even where the latter is cheaper (Rose, 2001,cited by Apaza et al, 2002). But some research suggests consumption habits are moresensitive to price and consumers choose the most af<strong>for</strong>dable meat available or hunt <strong>for</strong>themselves at no cost (Wilkie & Carpenter, 1999; Bowen-Jones, 1998; Apaza et al, 2002).Many studies have been carried out to determine price trends (Barnett, 2000; Steel,1994; King, 1994; Noss, 1998; Wilkie et al, 2005; Cowlishaw et al, 2005), but there isno governing precedent in bushmeat price across regions. Price dynamics are complexand influenced by fluctuating supply and demand. Typically, however, bushmeat is mostexpensive in urban areas (where supply is low) and least expensive in rural areas, wheresupply is high (Barnett, 2000). Fresh bushmeat is more expensive than the smokedproduct, which is common in urban centres because smoking preserves the meatduring transportation.41WSPA/APE ALLIANCE40
- Page 1 and 2: Recipes for Survival:Controlling th
- Page 3 and 4: 3.4. The effects of bushmeat huntin
- Page 5 and 6: 8RECIPES FOR SURVIVALExecutive Summ
- Page 7 and 8: WSPA/APE ALLIANCE12RECIPES FOR SURV
- Page 9 and 10: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 11 and 12: THE BROADER BUSHMEAT ISSUEThe broad
- Page 13 and 14: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 15 and 16: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 17 and 18: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 19: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 23 and 24: Primate bushmeat:current situation4
- Page 25 and 26: RECIPES FOR SURVIVALPRIMATE BUSHMEA
- Page 27 and 28: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 29 and 30: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 31 and 32: Actions ongoing andtheir effectiven
- Page 33 and 34: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 35 and 36: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 37 and 38: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 39 and 40: OBSTACLES TO CHANGEObstacles to cha
- Page 41 and 42: POTENTIAL SOLUTIONSPotential soluti
- Page 43 and 44: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 45 and 46: RECIPES FOR SURVIVALSupport for cer
- Page 47 and 48: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 49 and 50: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 51 and 52: RECIPES FOR SURVIVALto hunters and
- Page 53 and 54: RECIPES FOR SURVIVALAPPENDIXWSPA/AP
- Page 55 and 56: 108RECIPES FOR SURVIVAL.Organisatio
- Page 57 and 58: Gouala, J. (2005). Forum breathes l
- Page 59 and 60: Redmond, I. (2001) Coltan Boom, Gor
- Page 61 and 62: Muntiacus vuquangensis GIANT MUNTJA
- Page 63 and 64: Pteropus ornatus ORNATE FLYING FOXP
- Page 65 and 66: Miopithecus talapoin talapoin (W&C)
- Page 67 and 68: Myosciurus pumilio African pygmy sq
- Page 69 and 70: Ducula oceanica MICRONESIAN IMPERIA
- Page 71 and 72:
Alectoris chukar Chukar partridgeAl
- Page 73 and 74:
Pelecanus rufescens Pink-backed pel
- Page 75 and 76:
Sacalia quadriocellata Four-eyed tu
- Page 77 and 78:
Rana fukienensisRana grahamiRana gu
- Page 79 and 80:
Rhynchophorus ferrugineus papuanusR
- Page 81 and 82:
Hypoderma bovisOedemagena tarandiRh
- Page 83 and 84:
Ugada giovanninaUgada limbalisUgada
- Page 85 and 86:
PolybiaPolybia diguetanaPolybia ign
- Page 87 and 88:
Anaphe venataAntheua insignataDesme
- Page 89 and 90:
Acrida giganteaAcrida lataAcrida su
- Page 91 and 92:
PhasmatodeaPhasmatidaeEurycantha ho
- Page 93 and 94:
DD South and South and SE AsiaLR/lc
- Page 95 and 96:
VU A2c OceaniaVU A2b+3d Sub-Saharan
- Page 97 and 98:
LR/lc Sub-Saharan AfricaLR/lc Sub-S
- Page 99 and 100:
DD Sub-Saharan AfricaLC Sub-Saharan
- Page 101 and 102:
NT OceaniaVU B1ab(ii,iii,iv,v) Sout
- Page 103 and 104:
LC South and SE AsiaLC EuropeVU A2c
- Page 105 and 106:
LC Sub-Saharan AfricaCR D MesoAmeri
- Page 107 and 108:
EN A1d+2d South and SE AsiaVU A1cd+
- Page 109 and 110:
LC South and SE AsiaNT East Asia, S
- Page 111 and 112:
OceaniaMesoAmerica, Carribbean Isla
- Page 113 and 114:
North AmericaNorth AmericaNorth Ame
- Page 115 and 116:
Sub-Saharan AfricaSub-Saharan Afric
- Page 117 and 118:
MesoAmericaMesoAmericaSouth America
- Page 119 and 120:
Sub-Saharan AfricaSub-Saharan Afric
- Page 121 and 122:
West/Central AsiaEast AsiaSub-Sahar
- Page 123 and 124:
OceaniaOceaniaOceaniaSouth and SE A
- Page 125 and 126:
Papio cynocephalus Yellow baboon LR
- Page 127 and 128:
Berggorilla & Regenwald Stuttgart Z
- Page 129 and 130:
Bushmeat Crisis TaskForceJGI Africa
- Page 131 and 132:
COMIFAC (Council ofMinisters for Fo
- Page 133 and 134:
EAZA EAZA, IFAW EAZA Petition again
- Page 135 and 136:
Heifer International South West Far
- Page 137 and 138:
IUCN Conservation Breeding Speciali
- Page 139 and 140:
MINEF Anti-poaching unit CameroonMi
- Page 141 and 142:
Philadelphia Zoo Bushmeat Education
- Page 143 and 144:
TRAFFIC Review of bushmeat trade in
- Page 145 and 146:
WCS WCS Determining economics ofbus
- Page 147 and 148:
WCS, Bronx Zoo WCS Pattycake Fund W
- Page 149 and 150:
Wildlife Conservation Society, Amer
- Page 151 and 152:
WWF ? Vision for Biodiversity in Co
- Page 153 and 154:
Categories Keywords Dates Contact U
- Page 155 and 156:
Surveys, Research,Community Researc
- Page 157 and 158:
Funding, Research1995 - presentFund
- Page 159 and 160:
Livelihoods, Poverty,2002 Joanna El
- Page 161 and 162:
Coltan, MiningInformation , Educati
- Page 163 and 164:
Policy making, Exchangeinfo, Discus
- Page 165 and 166:
Awareness, Timber,Furniture, Coltan
- Page 167 and 168:
Bushmeat, Trade,Methodologies,Educa
- Page 169 and 170:
Self-sufficiency, Foodsecurity,Food
- Page 171 and 172:
Bushmeat, Utilization,Sustainabilit
- Page 173 and 174:
Population, Density,Foods, Research
- Page 175 and 176:
Law enforcement,Hunting, Densities,
- Page 177 and 178:
Campaigning, Primates,Apes, Awarene
- Page 179 and 180:
Research, Modeling,Birds, Fish, Pri
- Page 181 and 182:
Cameroon governmentMINEF Cameroon M
- Page 183 and 184:
Gorilla HavenGov CongoGov. Cameroon
- Page 185 and 186:
Peace CorpsPeopleandPlanet.netPercy
- Page 187 and 188:
Wisconsin Primate Research Center (
- Page 189 and 190:
11111412131116121112121124121916111
- Page 191 and 192:
122111112 Governments of Republic o
- Page 193 and 194:
2114111122 Primate Conservation1311
- Page 195:
286 World Resources Institute (WRI)