13.07.2015 Views

Half-yearly financial Report at June 30, 2013 - A2A

Half-yearly financial Report at June 30, 2013 - A2A

Half-yearly financial Report at June 30, 2013 - A2A

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Half</strong>-<strong>yearly</strong> <strong>financial</strong> report <strong>at</strong> <strong>June</strong> <strong>30</strong>, <strong>2013</strong>Other inform<strong>at</strong>ionASM Novara S.p.A. disputeRegional Administr<strong>at</strong>ive Court of Piedmont 79/2010 EdilCastello S.r.l. and Errevi S.r.l.vs. the Province of Novara toward Asm Novara S.p.A., <strong>A2A</strong> S.p.A. and PessinaCostruzioni134EdilCastello S.r.l. and Errevi S.r.l. - as the companies owning real est<strong>at</strong>e property loc<strong>at</strong>ed in theimmedi<strong>at</strong>e vicinity of the area intended for loc<strong>at</strong>ing the plant of the he<strong>at</strong>ing project of the cityof Novara - have filed appeal against: a) Ruling no. 4213 of November 9, 2010, with which theProvince of Novara expressed a positive opinion on the comp<strong>at</strong>ibility of the plan to build thedistrict he<strong>at</strong>ing plant; b) Resolution no. 326 d<strong>at</strong>ed August 1, 2005 of the Municipal Council ofNovara, declaring the public interest of the proposed project; c) Ruling no. 17 of July 13, 2006of the Urban Mobility Service of the Municipality of Novara, awarding the license to build andoper<strong>at</strong>e the district he<strong>at</strong>ing plant. The awarding process was found to be flawed due tosubjective errors of the contractors and the opinion of environmental comp<strong>at</strong>ibility waserroneous due to the lack of preliminary study since it did not account for the plant’sresidential loc<strong>at</strong>ion as a result of the previously approved building recovery process, with thefailure to evalu<strong>at</strong>e the public and priv<strong>at</strong>e interest of all parties.On January 21, 2010, the Regional Administr<strong>at</strong>ive Court issued Order no. 5 in which it enjoinedthe Province to file the municipal records subject to appeal. After the Province fulfilled thepreliminary oblig<strong>at</strong>ion, no other actions were posed.The shareholders have not entered an appearance and the company is represented byAttorney B. Savorelli.Court of Ferrara general docket 3707/2012 in opposition to injunction no. 9<strong>30</strong>/12general docket 2<strong>30</strong>0/12On <strong>June</strong> 27-28, 2012, the Court of Ferrara issued injunction no. 9<strong>30</strong>/12 in which it enjoined ASMNovara S.p.A. to pay INCICO S.p.A. (an engineering company hired to handle design work) anamount of 44,673.20 euro plus interest and charges for 2,590 euro. Notice of the injunctionwas served on ASM Novara S.p.A. on July 24, 2012; in turn, the company served timely notice ofthe summons in opposition, within the prescribed terms, to seek dismissal of the injunctiondue to the absence of jurisdiction of the Court of Ferrara, by virtue of the exclusive jurisdictionof the Court of Milan as per the contract, and the st<strong>at</strong>ement of inadmissibility of the petitionfor injunction. The amount of the receivable held by INCICO S.p.A. is equal to the last paymentinstallment set forth by contract. However, the contract stipul<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> full payment iscontingent on approval of the working plan by the Municipality of Novara, an event th<strong>at</strong> hasnot yet occurred.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!