13.07.2015 Views

Half-yearly financial Report at June 30, 2013 - A2A

Half-yearly financial Report at June 30, 2013 - A2A

Half-yearly financial Report at June 30, 2013 - A2A

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Half</strong>-<strong>yearly</strong> <strong>financial</strong> report <strong>at</strong> <strong>June</strong> <strong>30</strong>, <strong>2013</strong>Other inform<strong>at</strong>ionThe company filed an applic<strong>at</strong>ion for settlement against this assessment which was notaccepted by the Tax Revenue Office; it accordingly filed an appeal, requesting the TaxCommission to order the total cancell<strong>at</strong>ion of the notice. In October 2011 the Tax RevenueOffice notified a provision by internal review partially cancelling the subject assessment,upholding certain of the defensive arguments used by Edipower S.p.A. in connection with thecosts rel<strong>at</strong>ing to 2005 and considerably reducing the additional amounts of IRES and IRAPclaimed. The Milan Provincial Tax Commission fully upheld the company’s argumentsconcerning VAT on excise duty and partially upheld those regarding IRES and IRAP, orderingthe partial cancell<strong>at</strong>ion of the assessment.The Tax Revenue Office filed an appeal but only concerning IRES and IRAP; as a result,therefore, the dispute regarding VAT on excise duty for 2005 has been closed by means of an“internal judgment”.Edipower S.p.A. - VAT assessments Green Certific<strong>at</strong>es 2004 to 2010150On December 29, 2009 the Milan Tax Revenue Office served Edipower S.p.A. a VATassessment notice regarding fiscal 2004 and having as its object the alleged sales of GreenCertific<strong>at</strong>es by tollers for the 2004 “green” requirements. This assessment notice was notpreceded by an audit <strong>at</strong> the company’s premises; on the contrary, the Tax Revenue Office’sinform<strong>at</strong>ion and assumptions were taken from the assessments carried out <strong>at</strong> the tollers’premises in 2008 and 2009. In particular, in the assessment in question the Tax Revenue Officesanctioned Edipower S.p.A. for not having used the reverse charge procedure given th<strong>at</strong>invoices were not received for the alleged sales of the Green Certific<strong>at</strong>es which in the TaxRevenue Office’s opinion the tollers had made in 2005 to meet their oblig<strong>at</strong>ions for theprevious year. The amount of the penalty inflicted was 6.5 billion euro.Following opportune analyses which also included the tollers, it was considered th<strong>at</strong> the TaxRevenue Office’s conclusions could not be accepted. In fact under the tolling arrangements theowners of the electricity produced by Edipower S.p.A. are “ab origine” the tollers, who are theowners of the fuel used. Under these arrangements each toller is responsible for theoper<strong>at</strong>ional and economic cost of obtaining the Green Certific<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> rel<strong>at</strong>e to th<strong>at</strong> toller onthe basis of the electricity produced according to his indic<strong>at</strong>ions and production plans, handingthem over to the Manager via Edipower S.p.A.. Under the tolling arrangements and therequirements of law there is no transfer of the ownership of the Green Certific<strong>at</strong>es between thetollers and Edipower S.p.A. and no fee passes between the parties; accordingly no transaction iscarried out for VAT purposes. For this reason no provision has been made in the <strong>financial</strong>st<strong>at</strong>ements for this m<strong>at</strong>ter.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!