13.07.2015 Views

Half-yearly financial Report at June 30, 2013 - A2A

Half-yearly financial Report at June 30, 2013 - A2A

Half-yearly financial Report at June 30, 2013 - A2A

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Half</strong>-<strong>yearly</strong> <strong>financial</strong> report <strong>at</strong> <strong>June</strong> <strong>30</strong>, <strong>2013</strong>Other inform<strong>at</strong>ionIn April <strong>2013</strong>, the Tax Revenue Office additionally served the company notice of the completecancell<strong>at</strong>ion of the demand for penalties for 2006 by internal procedure. These steps confirmearlier st<strong>at</strong>ements made verbally by officials of the Tax Revenue Office to the company’slawyers, concerning the fact th<strong>at</strong> the administr<strong>at</strong>ion had taken the decision to completelycancel all the VAT assessments served on tollers and tollees concerning Green Certific<strong>at</strong>es.Ecodeco S.r.l. (now <strong>A2A</strong> Ambiente S.r.l.) – Assessment for VAT purposes for fiscal2003On November 15, 2012 the Milan Tax Revenue Office notified th<strong>at</strong> it had filed an appeal with theSupreme Court against the sentence of the Lombardy Regional Tax Commission which upheldthe company’s arguments concerning the dispute with the Finance Police over VAT for a totalof 48,000 euro plus interest and penalties.On December 23, 2012 the company filed a cross appeal with the Supreme Court.152Ecodeco S.r.l. (now <strong>A2A</strong> Ambiente S.r.l.) – Assessment for VAT purposes for fiscal2006 and 2007On July 5 and 6, 2010 the Milan Tax Revenue Office 3 served four notices of VAT assessments forthe years 2006 and 2007 contesting the reduced VAT r<strong>at</strong>es applied to the disposal of RefuseDerived Fuel (RDF). This claim was accompanied by a demand for additional VAT of 472 thousandeuro for 2006 and 496 thousand euro for 2007, in both cases plus penalties and interest.Ecodeco S.r.l. filed an appeal with the appropri<strong>at</strong>e authorities against both tax assessmentnotices. The appeal was discussed on March 22, 2012.On May 15, 2012 the Milan Provincial Tax Commission (CTP) upheld the appeal.On December 10, 2012 the Milan Tax Revenue Office filed an appeal with the Milan Regional TaxCommission (CTR) against the sentence in the company’s favor. On February 8, <strong>2013</strong> thecompany filed a cross appeal. On July 9, <strong>2013</strong>, the Milan CTR rejected the appeal filed by theTax Revenue Office for three of the four notices.Discussion on the fourth assessment notice rel<strong>at</strong>ing to 2006 VAT for an amount of 157,435.00euro has been assigned to another section of the Milan CTR and will be discussed on October24, <strong>2013</strong>.Ecodeco S.r.l. (now <strong>A2A</strong> Ambiente S.r.l.) - Assessment for IRES/IRAP/VAT purposesfor fiscal 2007On August 17, 2011 notices of IRES and IRAP tax assessments were served, contesting amongother things the deductibility of the charge to a provision for risks, with the request for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!