13.07.2015 Views

The Common Law in India - College of Social Sciences and ...

The Common Law in India - College of Social Sciences and ...

The Common Law in India - College of Social Sciences and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>India</strong>n Constitution 193functions. Subject to these requirements the task<strong>of</strong> subord<strong>in</strong>ate legislation which by its very natureis ancillary to the statute can be delegated to anyother authority. In <strong>India</strong> whenever the validity <strong>of</strong>a delegated power is challenged the question ariseswhether <strong>in</strong> delegat<strong>in</strong>g the power the legislature hasabdicated its essential function <strong>of</strong> legislation. 26 Nosuch question can arise <strong>in</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong> by reason <strong>of</strong> thesovereignty <strong>of</strong> Parliament <strong>and</strong> its unlimited power <strong>of</strong>legislation.SUBORDINATE LEGISLATIONApart from what has been discussed the position <strong>in</strong><strong>India</strong> <strong>in</strong> regard to subord<strong>in</strong>ate legislation is notdifferent from that <strong>in</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong>. <strong>The</strong> exercise <strong>of</strong> thepowers, if properly delegated, are subject to the control<strong>of</strong> the courts which could be <strong>in</strong>voked if personsentrusted with the statutory powers exceed theauthority conferred on them by the statute. 27 In<strong>India</strong> the exercise <strong>of</strong> the delegated power so as toaffect the fundamental rights would be struck downfor the simple reason that the repository <strong>of</strong> delegatedpower cannot act <strong>in</strong> a manner <strong>in</strong> which the legislatureitself from which it derives its authority cannot act. 28What Lord Shaw stated <strong>in</strong> R. v. Halliday is as2« In re <strong>The</strong> Delhi <strong>Law</strong>s Act, 1912 (1951) S.C.E. 747, <strong>and</strong> Bajnara<strong>in</strong>S<strong>in</strong>gh v. Chairman Patna Adm<strong>in</strong>istration Committee (1955)1 S.C.B. 290.21 Beport <strong>of</strong> the Committee on M<strong>in</strong>isters' Powers, 1932; 1956repr<strong>in</strong>t, p. 12. Allen, 0. K., <strong>Law</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Mak<strong>in</strong>g, 6th ed.,pp. 549-555; Radha Krishan v. Compensation Officer, A.I.E.[1954] All. 202.28 Messrs. Dwarka Prasad Laxmi Nara<strong>in</strong> v. <strong>The</strong> State <strong>of</strong> UttorPradesh (1954) S.C.E. 803, <strong>and</strong> <strong>The</strong> State <strong>of</strong> Bajasthan v.Nath Mai (1954) S.C.E. 982.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!