13.07.2015 Views

The Common Law in India - College of Social Sciences and ...

The Common Law in India - College of Social Sciences and ...

The Common Law in India - College of Social Sciences and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> Rise <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Common</strong> <strong>Law</strong> 53has been to <strong>in</strong>troduce the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>in</strong>to the l<strong>and</strong><strong>and</strong> to embed it so firmly <strong>in</strong>to the lives <strong>of</strong> the peoplethat its displacement seems unlikely <strong>in</strong> any foreseeablefuture." 61IV.THE SELECTIVE APPLICATION OF ENGLISH LAWWe have seen that over the years English law be<strong>in</strong>gfounded on " justice <strong>and</strong> right" or " justice, equity<strong>and</strong> good conscience " its application had to conformto <strong>India</strong>n circumstances <strong>and</strong> conditions. This necessarilyresulted <strong>in</strong> what may be called a selectiveapplication <strong>of</strong> the English law <strong>in</strong> <strong>India</strong>. <strong>The</strong> adoption<strong>of</strong> the rules <strong>of</strong> English law by the <strong>India</strong>n courts wasneither automatic nor uncritical. Although theystarted with a presumption that a rule <strong>of</strong> English lawwould be <strong>in</strong> accordance with the pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>of</strong> justice,equity <strong>and</strong> good conscience, they bore <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d thereservation which was later expressed by the PrivyCouncil <strong>in</strong> the words " if found applicable to <strong>India</strong>nsociety <strong>and</strong> circumstances." 62 In several cases thecourts refused to apply the rules <strong>of</strong> English law onthe ground <strong>of</strong> their be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>applicable to <strong>India</strong>ncircumstances.As early as 1836 the Privy Council held that theEnglish law <strong>in</strong>capacitat<strong>in</strong>g aliens from hold<strong>in</strong>g realproperty had not been <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> <strong>India</strong>. 63 Similarly<strong>in</strong> 1863 they held that the English law <strong>of</strong> felode se <strong>and</strong> consequent forfeiture <strong>of</strong> property did not61 Mr. Justice Vivian Bose, " <strong>The</strong> Migration <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Common</strong><strong>Law</strong> " (1960) 76 L.Q.K. p. 63.« Waghela v. Sheik (1887) 14 LA. 89, at p. 96.83 Mayor <strong>of</strong> Lyons v. East <strong>India</strong> Company (1836) 1 Moore, Ind.App. 175, 271.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!