03.12.2012 Views

The Significance and Sustainability of Charcoal Production in the ...

The Significance and Sustainability of Charcoal Production in the ...

The Significance and Sustainability of Charcoal Production in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>the</strong> electromagnetic radiation (EMR) from those objects. Spectral radiance is def<strong>in</strong>ed as <strong>the</strong><br />

energy at a specific wavelength radiated by an object <strong>of</strong> unit area per solid angle <strong>of</strong><br />

measurement (watts per square metre per steradian per micrometer: W m-2 sr-1 �m). <strong>The</strong><br />

spectral composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> signal is modified by <strong>in</strong>teractions with <strong>the</strong> atmosphere both on <strong>the</strong><br />

upward <strong>and</strong> on <strong>the</strong> downward journey. Because atmosphere is not constant its composition<br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> space or time, <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> EMR recorded by <strong>the</strong> sensor is not <strong>the</strong> same. <strong>The</strong> removal<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> effects caused by atmospheric <strong>in</strong>teraction rema<strong>in</strong>s one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fundamental problems <strong>of</strong><br />

RS (Ma<strong>the</strong>r 1992: 60-61). Pre-process<strong>in</strong>g is done <strong>in</strong> order to remove, as far as possible, <strong>the</strong><br />

‘external’ effects <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> image; sensor calibration, correction for atmospheric, illum<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong><br />

view<strong>in</strong>g geometry effects, <strong>and</strong> to conduct geo-referenc<strong>in</strong>g which refers to <strong>the</strong> registration <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> image to an accepted map projection (ibid. 60).<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> preprocess<strong>in</strong>g level 2A <strong>of</strong> acquired SPOT data, <strong>the</strong> geometric correction has<br />

been conducted, i.e. <strong>the</strong> data has been orthorectified to a UTM projection with a WGS-84<br />

spheroid <strong>and</strong> datum. Survey <strong>of</strong> Kenya digitized topographic map mosaic that conta<strong>in</strong>s grid<br />

coord<strong>in</strong>ates was used as reference image for an ‘image-to-map’ rectification that was<br />

conducted for <strong>the</strong> 2005 SPOT 4 image <strong>in</strong> ERDAS IMAGINE sett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Geometric Model to<br />

polynomial <strong>and</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> geo-correction tools to choose ten ground control po<strong>in</strong>ts (GCPs)<br />

from <strong>the</strong> reference map before automatic transformation calculation that gave <strong>the</strong> RMS error<br />

figure <strong>of</strong> 0.3409 which is less than 1 (pixel) as recommended. A l<strong>in</strong>ear transformation (an<br />

equation <strong>of</strong> polynomial order 1) was used because <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al <strong>and</strong> desired output projection<br />

systems are actually very similar. <strong>The</strong> image was saved, or re-sampled, with nearest<br />

neighbour option. An ‘image-to-image’ rectification was done <strong>the</strong>reafter us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> previously<br />

rectified image as reference image <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2006 SPOT 4 image as <strong>in</strong>put image. <strong>The</strong> RMS<br />

error figure was 0.3852. <strong>The</strong> same procedures were conducted for <strong>the</strong> 2011 images, <strong>the</strong> 2011a<br />

image that was rectified us<strong>in</strong>g 2005 image as reference gave RMS error 0.4921 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2011b<br />

image that was rectified us<strong>in</strong>g 2006 image as reference 0.4905.<br />

As <strong>the</strong> context area is gently undulat<strong>in</strong>g lowl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>the</strong>re was no need for topographical<br />

correction. Nei<strong>the</strong>r atmospheric correction was conducted as it was not considered necessary.<br />

Radiometric correction is done to normalize <strong>the</strong> sensor. <strong>The</strong> header file <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> SPOT <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>the</strong><br />

ga<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>fset values that are needed <strong>in</strong> convert<strong>in</strong>g count values to radiance or reflectance.<br />

<strong>The</strong> sensor ga<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>fset vary over <strong>the</strong> life <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sensor which leads to that a raw pixel<br />

value (DN) cannot have any absolute mean<strong>in</strong>g (Ma<strong>the</strong>r 1992: 60). DN values <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> used<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!