13.07.2015 Views

Mapping the Big Green Challenge - The Skills & Learning ...

Mapping the Big Green Challenge - The Skills & Learning ...

Mapping the Big Green Challenge - The Skills & Learning ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

128 Chapter 7.9 – Low Carbon Connections7.9.2 <strong>Challenge</strong>r Group Types<strong>The</strong>re is a greater proportion of registered companies and charities in this category than over <strong>the</strong>whole data set, with just six of <strong>the</strong> applications from informal groups. Many of <strong>the</strong>se wereorganisations from within <strong>the</strong> sector: student groups targeting students, academics aiming toimplement measures within Higher Education institutions. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Challenge</strong>r groups tackling specificsectors are, <strong>the</strong>refore, essentially ‘grassroots’ in that <strong>the</strong>y have emerged from within <strong>the</strong>ir owncommunity.<strong>The</strong> exceptions are <strong>the</strong> workplacebased proposals, where <strong>the</strong> <strong>Challenge</strong>rorganisation is aiming to change <strong>the</strong>10behaviours of its own staff. (This is8based on <strong>the</strong> impression that <strong>the</strong>se6applications have emanated from <strong>the</strong>management of <strong>the</strong>se organisations, 4which appears to be <strong>the</strong> case but is 2not always explicit in <strong>the</strong> applications.) 0<strong>The</strong> workplace applications are allfrom registered charities: largeorganisations with over 30 staff thathave been in existence for at least 10 years.7.9.3 Project ProcessesChart 96 – Connections, challenger groupformalities273 3Sectors and Groups9Single organisation(work-based)CharityRegistered companyConstituted groupUnconstituted group7.9.3.1 Behaviour ChangeAs regards strategies for behavioural change, present in 20 of <strong>the</strong> applications, <strong>the</strong>se Connectionsproposals do have a better than average range of <strong>the</strong> Four ‘E’s (Engage, Encourage, Enable,Exemplify) and a high number combining Action, Understanding and Value measures compared with<strong>the</strong> full data set. Bearing in mind that only proposals with behavioural change as a carbon reductiongoal are included in this calculation, it is perhaps surprising that this category has <strong>the</strong> highestproportion of Action/Understanding/Values combined of all <strong>the</strong> proposal categories. This is possiblyrelated to <strong>the</strong> systemic nature of most of <strong>the</strong> proposals (<strong>the</strong> Zones are <strong>the</strong> second highestAction/Understanding/Values and <strong>the</strong>se are also highly systemic). Having decided on a scheme toreduce carbon emissions in a particular sector, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Challenge</strong>rs aim to tackle emissions in all parts of<strong>the</strong> sector, and <strong>the</strong> different emission goals are tackled with different strategies. Taking eachelement of <strong>the</strong> proposal, it is less likely that all behavioural change mechanisms will be brought tobear on a single goal.Appleby Ltd July 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!