13.07.2015 Views

Mapping the Big Green Challenge - The Skills & Learning ...

Mapping the Big Green Challenge - The Skills & Learning ...

Mapping the Big Green Challenge - The Skills & Learning ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

26 Chapter 3 - <strong>Mapping</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Challenge</strong>rsChart 6 – <strong>Challenge</strong>r group origin compared with formality (legal status)Unconstituted group5931Constituted group5016Bottom upPartnershipTop downRegistered company4919Charity705470% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%<strong>The</strong> origin of a group influences <strong>the</strong> amount of independence it has in its own decision making, and<strong>the</strong> groups of top down origin are less likely to have full autonomy, many being constrained by <strong>the</strong>policies of <strong>the</strong>ir parent organisation. Constrained independents are groups that voluntarily affiliate<strong>the</strong>mselves to ano<strong>the</strong>r organisation, such as a local environmental group deciding to identify<strong>the</strong>mselves with <strong>the</strong> Friends of <strong>the</strong> Earth network. In doing so, <strong>the</strong>y gain an identity and supportfrom <strong>the</strong> parent organisation, but <strong>the</strong> group itself makes decisions about its activities and methodsof working, within <strong>the</strong> constraints imposed by <strong>the</strong> parent organisation. Autonomous sub-groups aregroups formed within a community organisation (such as a faith group) but which are not affiliatedto <strong>the</strong> parent. <strong>The</strong>y retain an identity inherited from <strong>the</strong> parent body. Dependent sub-groupsinclude branches of organisations set up by national bodies, which take <strong>the</strong>ir direction and activitiesfrom <strong>the</strong>ir parent group, and core grant funded bodies dependent on a parent organisation forcontinued support.Chart 7 – Group autonomy, 315 proposalsDependent subgroup7%Partnership6%Autonomous subgroup3%Constrainedindependent20%Independent64%AutonomyNo. ofProposalsIndependent 202Constrained63independentAutonomous sub-group 9Dependent sub-group 21Partnership 20Total 315Appleby Ltd July 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!