13.07.2015 Views

Reformed Presbyterian Minutes of Synod 1995 - Rparchives.org

Reformed Presbyterian Minutes of Synod 1995 - Rparchives.org

Reformed Presbyterian Minutes of Synod 1995 - Rparchives.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8 MINUTES OF THE SYNOD OF THEI. That the order <strong>of</strong> business and hours <strong>of</strong> meeting stated in the Docket beaccepted as the agenda for this meeting <strong>of</strong> <strong>Synod</strong>.2. That the following be referred to the Nominating Committee:a. Those to whom letters <strong>of</strong> remembrance should be sent (1974<strong>Minutes</strong>, p. 60);b. Those to be elected to fill vacancies on <strong>Synod</strong>'s boards andpermanent committees.3. That the Moderator appoint a committee <strong>of</strong> three to canvass the overture.4. That the matter <strong>of</strong> re-numbering the paragraphs in Chapter 25 <strong>of</strong> theTestimony be referred to the Committee to Canvass the Overture.Respectfully submitted,J. Bruce Martin, ClerkThe seminary students who are serving <strong>Synod</strong> as pages wereintroduced to the court: Keith Black, Brian Coombs, Aaron Goernerand Tom Gray.The report <strong>of</strong> the Business <strong>of</strong> <strong>Synod</strong> Committee onCommunications was taken up. Items 1 and 2 were adopted. Thereport as a whole was approved and is as follows:COMMITTEE ON THE BUSINESS OF SYNODTwo communications have come to the committee; we are making ourrecommendations on these communications to the <strong>Synod</strong>.Communication 95-1This communication is from two members <strong>of</strong> the Midwest Presbytery andapproved for transfer to <strong>Synod</strong> by the Presbytery. The communication asksfor changes in the Directory for Church Government relative to proceduresfor the election <strong>of</strong> certain servants <strong>of</strong> the denomination.The essence <strong>of</strong> this proposal came to the <strong>Synod</strong> in 1993 and was returnedto the Presbytery on the grounds that too many details <strong>of</strong> the proposal wereunclear. It was amended and brought to the <strong>Synod</strong> <strong>of</strong> 1994. The JudicialCommittee recommended approval <strong>of</strong> the provisions, but thoserecommendations were rejected by the <strong>Synod</strong>. This communication differs indetail from the preceding communications, but the heart <strong>of</strong> the proposalremains the same.The Business <strong>of</strong> <strong>Synod</strong> believes that itis counter-productive to haveessentially the same issue brought up year after year. Nevertheless, thecommunication has been brought to <strong>Synod</strong> through the proper channels.We recommend that this communication be referred to the JudicialCommittee for their recommendation to the <strong>Synod</strong> this year.The ground for this recommendation is that the proposal involvesconstitutional issues, including the question as to whether these proposals, ifadopted, require the sending down <strong>of</strong> an overture.Communication 95-2This communication comes to the <strong>Synod</strong> from the Great Lakes-GulfPresbytery. Itis a petition to reverse the decision <strong>of</strong> the 1994 <strong>Synod</strong>, which

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!