13.07.2015 Views

Reformed Presbyterian Minutes of Synod 1995 - Rparchives.org

Reformed Presbyterian Minutes of Synod 1995 - Rparchives.org

Reformed Presbyterian Minutes of Synod 1995 - Rparchives.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 67to continue, members <strong>of</strong> boards and committees are limited to twoconsecutive terms. Vacancies may be filled by tlie Moderator, Clerk andAssistant Clerk. "RECOMMENDATION 4 THAT THE SYNOD ADD THE UNDERLINEDWORDS ABOVE TO THE DIRECTORY FOR CHURCH GOVERNMENT,CHAPTER 7, SECTION 10.Vacancies on the Business <strong>of</strong> <strong>Synod</strong> CommitteeThe terms <strong>of</strong> Harry Metzger and Kenneth Smith expire in <strong>1995</strong>; bothare eligible for reelection. The terms <strong>of</strong> James Carson and Raymond Mortonexpire in 1996; both are eligible for reelection. Because neither <strong>of</strong> the menelected in 1994 was able to serve, the committee strongly recommends there-election <strong>of</strong> the present members for the purpose <strong>of</strong> continuity.Vacancies in the class <strong>of</strong> 1997: 2 to be electedClass <strong>of</strong> 1998: Recommend H. Metzger and K. SmithClass <strong>of</strong> 1999: Recommend R. Morton and J. CarsonThis will automatically be referred to the Committee on Nominations.The Finance CommitteeThe presence <strong>of</strong> Jay Worsham <strong>of</strong> the Finance Committee was veryvaluable. Mr. Hutmire sat in on some our sessions as well. Among otherfindings arising from the discussion was the realization <strong>of</strong> the difficult,if notimpossible, task <strong>of</strong> the Finance Committee because <strong>of</strong> the large turnover <strong>of</strong>its members and the potentially high proportion <strong>of</strong> the committee with nopreceding exposure to the work <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Synod</strong> andits agencies. While notmaking any recommendations now, we believe the structure <strong>of</strong> the FinanceCommitteeis a matter for serious reconsideration. No recommendations.Meeting with Representatives <strong>of</strong> AgenciesThe Business <strong>of</strong> <strong>Synod</strong> Committee was obligated to bring together therepresentatives <strong>of</strong> the major participating agencies in RPMscM for aconsultation. The time for that meeting was set for March 17, <strong>1995</strong>, from8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. Representatives <strong>of</strong> the four major financialparticipants in RPMscM were present; in addition, Sandra Johns sat in onbehalf <strong>of</strong> the Woman's Association.The presentations and discussions <strong>of</strong> the day were extremely valuable andhelpful and we sense a growing desire for a team effort in the work <strong>of</strong> thedenomination. The reality is, however, that the financial needs for the work<strong>of</strong> the agencies appear to surpass the available funds. Some <strong>of</strong> the discussioncentered around ways in which there might be some readjustments for thenext year or two.Undoubtedly the major point raised in this meeting was the need foradditional men for ministry. This is seen in the manpower needs <strong>of</strong> theForeign Mission Board, the Home Mission Board, vacant pastorates, and thesmall number <strong>of</strong> RPCNA students at the Seminary in Pittsburgh. While theneed for finances is great, the need for menis greater yet. May we join

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!