13.07.2015 Views

Bursting and Spalling in Pretensioned U-Beams - Ferguson ...

Bursting and Spalling in Pretensioned U-Beams - Ferguson ...

Bursting and Spalling in Pretensioned U-Beams - Ferguson ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Horizontal cracks <strong>in</strong> both the burst<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> spall<strong>in</strong>g zone wrapped around the beamends, <strong>and</strong> seemed to engage the end-block transverse re<strong>in</strong>forcement, especially at squareend (Location 1B). Flexural cracks from the top edge of the beam began 3 ft. from thebeam end (outside the beam end region). These cracks were 0.025 <strong>in</strong>. <strong>in</strong> width or less,with most measur<strong>in</strong>g 0.010 <strong>in</strong>.4.2.2.2 Beam 1: Str<strong>and</strong> StressesAt transfer, gages on prestress<strong>in</strong>g str<strong>and</strong>s recorded decreases <strong>in</strong> stra<strong>in</strong>, fromwhich, through multiplication by an experimentally determ<strong>in</strong>ed modulus (determ<strong>in</strong>edthrough test<strong>in</strong>g reported <strong>in</strong> Section 3.4.2), the prestress loss at <strong>in</strong>strumented sections canbe <strong>in</strong>ferred. Prestress losses are represented <strong>in</strong> Figure 4.4 by circle area.Losses, subtracted from the <strong>in</strong>itial prestress, give effective prestress. With<strong>in</strong> thetransfer length, the effective prestress <strong>in</strong>creases with distance <strong>in</strong>to the beam. As theeffective prestress stabilizes 30 <strong>in</strong>. <strong>in</strong>to the beam (Figure 4.5), the experimentallydeterm<strong>in</strong>ed transfer length matches the code value (30 <strong>in</strong>. for both the ACI 318 <strong>and</strong>AASHTO LRFD equations, as discussed <strong>in</strong> Section 3.2.1).The prestress loss measured one transfer length <strong>in</strong>to the beam can be taken as theprestress loss from beam elastic shorten<strong>in</strong>g. The average values at the stress<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> fixedends were similar (22 <strong>and</strong> 23 ksi, Figure 4.4) <strong>and</strong> comparable with the code-predictedvalue (25 ksi, reported <strong>in</strong> Appendix C). Past studies of prestress losses <strong>in</strong> Texas U-beams(Gross & Burns, 2000; Tadros et al., 2003) have similarly shown the elastic-shorten<strong>in</strong>gloss provisions to be accurate.153

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!