13.07.2015 Views

The Rise of the Fourth Reich - ThereAreNoSunglasses

The Rise of the Fourth Reich - ThereAreNoSunglasses

The Rise of the Fourth Reich - ThereAreNoSunglasses

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

334 THE RISE OF THE FOURTH REICHgovernment, in May 2007, responding to news accounts, acknowledged ithad secretly established a new national antiterrorist unit to protect VIPsby first pr<strong>of</strong>iling, <strong>the</strong>n arresting persons considered to be potentially dangerous.Amazingly, this power to detain suspects even before <strong>the</strong>y actuallycommitted a crime was based on mental health laws.“<strong>The</strong> Fixated Threat Assessment Centre (FTAC) was quietly establishedlast October [2006] and is set to reignite controversy over <strong>the</strong> detention<strong>of</strong> suspects without trial,” wrote <strong>The</strong> Times reporter Joanna Bale.“Until now it has been up to mental health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals to determine ifsomeone should be forcibly detained, but <strong>the</strong> new unit uses <strong>the</strong> police toidentify suspects, increasing fears that distinctions are being blurred betweencriminal investigations and doctors’ clinical decisions.”<strong>The</strong> FTAC unit will be staffed by four police <strong>of</strong>ficers, two civilian researchers,a psychiatrist, a psychologist, and a community mental healthnurse. It was hailed as <strong>the</strong> first joint mental health–police unit in <strong>the</strong>United Kingdom and a “prototype for future joint services” in o<strong>the</strong>r areas.Even as this police unit was assuming <strong>the</strong> power to arrest and holdpotential “suspects,” Scotland Yard refused to discuss how many suspectshave been forcibly hospitalized by <strong>the</strong> team, because <strong>of</strong> “patient confidentiality.”Meanwhile, <strong>the</strong> British government was introducing legislation tobroaden <strong>the</strong> definition <strong>of</strong> mental disorders to give doctors—and nowpolice—more power to detain people.“<strong>The</strong>re is a grave danger <strong>of</strong> this being used to deal with people where<strong>the</strong>re is insufficient evidence for a criminal prosecution,” said GarethCrossman, policy director for Britain’s National Council for Civil Liberties.“This blurs <strong>the</strong> line between medical decisions and police actions. Ifyou are going to allow doctors to take people’s liberty away, <strong>the</strong>y have tobe independent. That credibility is undermined when <strong>the</strong> doctors are part<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same team as <strong>the</strong> police. This raises serious concerns. First, that youhave a unit that allows police investigation to lead directly to people beingsectioned without any kind <strong>of</strong> criminal proceedings. Secondly, it is beingdone under <strong>the</strong> umbrella <strong>of</strong> antiterrorism at a time when <strong>the</strong> governmentis looking at ways to detain terrorists without putting <strong>the</strong>m on trial.”Is this coming to America soon? Libertarians fear that such measuresmight be slipped into legislation such as funding for <strong>the</strong> military or

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!