13.07.2015 Views

The Rise of the Fourth Reich - ThereAreNoSunglasses

The Rise of the Fourth Reich - ThereAreNoSunglasses

The Rise of the Fourth Reich - ThereAreNoSunglasses

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PSYCHOLOGY AND PUBLIC CONTROL 341Charlie Savage, writing in <strong>the</strong> Boston Globe, said Bush is <strong>the</strong> first presidentin modern history who has never vetoed a bill, thus giving Congressno chance to override his judgments. (In late 2007, Bush’s veto <strong>of</strong> a $23billion water resources bill critics claimed was laden with pork projectswas overridden by both <strong>the</strong> House and <strong>the</strong> Senate, marking <strong>the</strong> first timein a decade that Congress passed legislation over a presidential veto.) Bush<strong>of</strong>ten invites <strong>the</strong> bills’ sponsors to signing ceremonies, at which he lavishespraise upon <strong>the</strong>ir work. But Savage noted: “<strong>The</strong>n, after <strong>the</strong> media and <strong>the</strong>lawmakers have left <strong>the</strong> White House, Bush quietly files ‘signingstatements’—<strong>of</strong>ficial documents in which a president lays out his legal interpretation<strong>of</strong> a bill for <strong>the</strong> federal bureaucracy to follow when implementing<strong>the</strong> new law. <strong>The</strong> statements are recorded in <strong>the</strong> federal register.In his signing statements, Bush has repeatedly asserted that <strong>the</strong> Constitutiongives him <strong>the</strong> right to ignore numerous sections <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bills—sometimesincluding provisions that were <strong>the</strong> subject <strong>of</strong> negotiations withCongress in order to get lawmakers to pass <strong>the</strong> bill.”Van Bergen took particular note <strong>of</strong> Bush’s signing statement while hewas signing into law legislation curtailing torture on prisoners. “WhenPresident Bush signed <strong>the</strong> new law, sponsored by Senator [ John] McCain,restricting <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> torture when interrogating detainees, he also issueda presidential signing statement,” said Van Bergen. “That statement assertedthat his power as commander in chief gives him <strong>the</strong> authority tobypass <strong>the</strong> very law he had just signed.”Portland State University law pr<strong>of</strong>essor Phillip Cooper told newsmenBush and his legal team spent <strong>the</strong> past five years quietly working to concentrateever more governmental power in <strong>the</strong> White House. “<strong>The</strong>re isno question that this administration has been involved in a very carefullythought out, systematic pro cess <strong>of</strong> expanding presidential power at <strong>the</strong>expense <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r branches <strong>of</strong> government. This is really big, very expansive,and very significant,” Cooper said.Little is said <strong>of</strong> such things, because <strong>the</strong> Bush White House is moreclosed-mou<strong>the</strong>d than any previous administration. In <strong>the</strong> Nixon, Reagan,Clinton, and both Bush administrations, loyalty has been seen as a requisitefor those serving <strong>the</strong> White House. Many people working with <strong>the</strong>highest levels <strong>of</strong> power in <strong>the</strong> United States see <strong>the</strong>ir superiors as public

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!