13.07.2015 Views

The Rise of the Fourth Reich - ThereAreNoSunglasses

The Rise of the Fourth Reich - ThereAreNoSunglasses

The Rise of the Fourth Reich - ThereAreNoSunglasses

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

354 THE RISE OF THE FOURTH REICHHitler achieved this conformity <strong>of</strong> thought among his followersthrough <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> radio, mass rallies, and meetings. Today, it is <strong>the</strong>corporate- controlled mass media that determines <strong>the</strong> worldview <strong>of</strong> mostAmericans. <strong>The</strong> corporate media owners, many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m members or closeassociates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fascist globalists’ secret societies, have learned <strong>the</strong> lessons<strong>of</strong> Nazi media manipulation well—i.e., simplistic catchwords repeatedconstantly with no real opposing viewpoints allowed. For example, at <strong>the</strong>time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Iraqi invasion, <strong>the</strong> corporate media called <strong>the</strong> enemy “insurgents,”defined as anyone who opposed <strong>the</strong> established authority. This, <strong>of</strong>course, meant Iraqis opposed to <strong>the</strong> U.S. occupation, but <strong>the</strong> term “Iraqis”did not fit well with government pronouncements about U.S. troops beingwell received by that nation’s population. By 2007, <strong>the</strong> term “insurgent”was being superseded by <strong>the</strong> term “al-Qaeda” in an effort to connectfighting in Iraq to <strong>the</strong> attacks <strong>of</strong> September 11, 2001. This attempt camein <strong>the</strong> wake <strong>of</strong> President Bush’s admission that nei<strong>the</strong>r Saddam Husseinnor Iraq played any role in <strong>the</strong> attacks. Likewise, <strong>the</strong> mass media long andloudly has trumpeted <strong>the</strong> term “War on Terror,” with its attendant warningsto be watchful for terrorists trying to slip weapons <strong>of</strong> mass destructioninto <strong>the</strong> United States, yet noticeably failed to report that even sevenyears after 9/11, no serious attempt has been made to secure <strong>the</strong> nation’sborders. Official government pronouncements are merely broadcast uncritically,with very little effort to check <strong>the</strong>ir reliability.Also, like Hitler, <strong>the</strong> directors <strong>of</strong> modern American viewpoints speak<strong>of</strong> a brighter and better tomorrow, yet constantly regale <strong>the</strong> public withimages and evocations <strong>of</strong> great moments in history. <strong>The</strong> attacks <strong>of</strong> 9/11initially were compared to Pearl Harbor, and President Bush early on garneredcriticism for calling his War on Terror a “crusade,” a term with uglyhistorical connotations. <strong>The</strong> sacrifices <strong>of</strong> wartime America during WorldWar II were pointed to as models for <strong>the</strong> war against terrorism.<strong>The</strong> Nazis brought complex social and economic issues down to onesingle concept—<strong>the</strong> Aryan German in a death struggle with <strong>the</strong> InternationalJew. Nearly <strong>the</strong> same concept is widespread in America—<strong>the</strong>freedom-loving American in a “war on terror” with Muslim fanatics. Such“us against <strong>the</strong>m” mentality has been used by despots for centuries to rallypopulations behind <strong>the</strong>m.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!