13.07.2015 Views

The Rise of the Fourth Reich - ThereAreNoSunglasses

The Rise of the Fourth Reich - ThereAreNoSunglasses

The Rise of the Fourth Reich - ThereAreNoSunglasses

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PSYCHOLOGY AND PUBLIC CONTROL 335Homeland Security. Many conspiracy researchers suspect that <strong>the</strong> globaliststry out new policies and methods in <strong>the</strong> United Kingdom first, tosee if <strong>the</strong>y are accepted by <strong>the</strong> public.Once <strong>of</strong>fenders are picked up, today <strong>the</strong>y face new types <strong>of</strong> unconstitutionaltrials. Some researchers saw Bush’s Military Commissions Act withits secret tribunals as an echo <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Third <strong>Reich</strong> “special courts,” whichwere designed to prosecute political resistance to <strong>the</strong> Nazi administration.“<strong>The</strong> main duty <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> special courts was to criminally prosecute <strong>the</strong> politicalresistance to <strong>the</strong> Nazi regime,” wrote Dr. Thomas Roeder, VolkerKubillus, and Anthony Burwell in <strong>the</strong>ir book Psychiatrists—<strong>the</strong> Men BehindHitler. “During <strong>the</strong> Second World War, <strong>the</strong>y gradually took over <strong>the</strong>duties <strong>of</strong> ordinary justice and from 1942 on, most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sentencing. Expertsestimate that <strong>the</strong> special court <strong>of</strong> Hannover alone, one <strong>of</strong> several intoday’s Saxony, sentenced 4,000 defendants, about 170 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m to death.”Ano<strong>the</strong>r eerie parallel between <strong>the</strong> Bush administration and <strong>the</strong> Third<strong>Reich</strong> involved <strong>the</strong> Fuehrerprinzip, or leader principle, which was outlinedin Hitler’s book Mein Kampf. This principle stated <strong>the</strong> leader embodiedNational Socialism and <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong> people. All decision-makingrested with him. Such thinking evolves from <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> trust in <strong>the</strong> people.National Socialism, like our democracy, was supposedly a movement<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> masses. But its leadership had little faith in its followers.“[Nazi] ideology denounced civilian methods <strong>of</strong> elections, negotiation,and compromise as horse trading and called for authority <strong>of</strong> command,discipline and obedience,” noted Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Louis L. Snyder in his Encyclopedia<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Third <strong>Reich</strong>. This top-down leadership principle sounds eerilysimilar to calls by President George W. Bush for a “unified presidency” aswell as his comment to reporters in April 2006, “I hear <strong>the</strong> voices, and Iread <strong>the</strong> front page, and I know <strong>the</strong> speculation. But I’m <strong>the</strong> decider, and Idecide what is best.” “Perhaps <strong>the</strong> most unique feature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bush administrationis its protracted period <strong>of</strong> unified party control <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> government,a stark contrast to <strong>the</strong> divided governments <strong>of</strong> George H. W. Bushand Ronald Reagan,” noted Kathryn Dunn Tenpas, a senior fellow with<strong>the</strong> Brookings Institution.Civil libertarians historically have heeded <strong>the</strong> statement <strong>of</strong> patriot ThomasPaine, who wrote in Common Sense, “In America, <strong>the</strong> law is king. For

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!