04.12.2012 Views

Evaluation of Septic Tank and Subsurface Wetland for

Evaluation of Septic Tank and Subsurface Wetland for

Evaluation of Septic Tank and Subsurface Wetland for

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

coli<strong>for</strong>m by 88%. The Retrieve septic tank reduced total coli<strong>for</strong>m by 95% <strong>and</strong> fecal<br />

coli<strong>for</strong>m by 97%. All <strong>of</strong> these septic tanks per<strong>for</strong>med better than the 25 – 66% coli<strong>for</strong>m<br />

removal rates reported in literature <strong>for</strong> septic tanks (Seabloom et al., 1982; Rahman et al.,<br />

1999). The very high coli<strong>for</strong>m reduction in the Retrieve septic tank may have been<br />

promoted by dilution from the continuous flow <strong>of</strong> chlorinated water through the urinal.<br />

The Pisgah wetl<strong>and</strong> had a measured 3 log (99.9%) reduction <strong>of</strong> total <strong>and</strong> fecal coli<strong>for</strong>m.<br />

The Retrieve wetl<strong>and</strong> had a measured 2 log (99%) reduction <strong>of</strong> total coli<strong>for</strong>m <strong>and</strong> 3 log<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> fecal coli<strong>for</strong>m. A 2 to 3 log reduction <strong>of</strong> fecal coli<strong>for</strong>m is expected <strong>for</strong> a<br />

wetl<strong>and</strong> with 5 – 10 day HRT (Reed et al., 2001). HRT averaged 2.2 days in the Retrieve<br />

wetl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> 41 days in the Pisgah wetl<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Table 5-8 Total Coli<strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> Pisgah <strong>and</strong> Retrieve Sanitation Systems<br />

________________________________________________________________________<br />

Sample Geometric Mean 90% Confidence Interval Sample<br />

( X ) MPN/100ml Mean MPN/100ml Size (n)<br />

Pisgah First <strong>Septic</strong> <strong>Tank</strong> 3,500,000 X ± 2,780,000 5<br />

Pisgah Wetl<strong>and</strong> Influent 422,000 X ± 1,450,000 5<br />

Pisgah Wetl<strong>and</strong> Effluent 234 X ± 20,200<br />

4<br />

Retrieve First <strong>Septic</strong> <strong>Tank</strong> 2,040,000 X ± 11,300,000 6<br />

Retrieve Wetl<strong>and</strong> Influent 94,400 X ± 58,700<br />

6<br />

Retrieve Wetl<strong>and</strong> Effluent 386 X ± 1,140<br />

7<br />

Table 5-9 Fecal Coli<strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> Pisgah <strong>and</strong> Retrieve Sanitation Systems<br />

________________________________________________________________________<br />

Sample Geometric Mean 90% Confidence Interval Sample<br />

( X ) MPN/100ml Mean MPN/100ml Size (n)<br />

Pisgah First <strong>Septic</strong> <strong>Tank</strong> 3,200,000 X ± 3,280,000 4<br />

Pisgah Wetl<strong>and</strong> Influent 379,000 X ± 1,930,000 4<br />

Pisgah Wetl<strong>and</strong> Effluent 140 X ± 1,600<br />

3<br />

Retrieve First <strong>Septic</strong> <strong>Tank</strong> 3,360,000 X ± 14,000,000 5<br />

Retrieve Wetl<strong>and</strong> Influent 85,000 X ± 75,100<br />

5<br />

Retrieve Wetl<strong>and</strong> Effluent 73 X ± 831<br />

5<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!