13.07.2015 Views

DBI Analysis of Open String Bound States on Non-compact D-branes

DBI Analysis of Open String Bound States on Non-compact D-branes

DBI Analysis of Open String Bound States on Non-compact D-branes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 2. BOSONIC STRINGS 20which c<strong>on</strong>firms our claim for p µ . Furthermore, simply applying the definiti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> anaverage to X µ (σ), we see that1π∫ π0dσX µ (σ, τ) = x µ + l 2 sp µ τ, (2.38)indicating that x µ is the center <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> mass positi<strong>on</strong> at time τ = 0. Note that x µ and p µare arbitrary, i.e. if we wanted to we could explicitely fill them in, thereby specifying aninitial positi<strong>on</strong> and momentum for our string.2.5.2 <str<strong>on</strong>g>Open</str<strong>on</strong>g> string expansi<strong>on</strong>A feature present in all open string expansi<strong>on</strong>s is that <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e set <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> expansi<strong>on</strong> coefficientsα is present. Before giving the expansi<strong>on</strong>s, this can already be understoodby realizing that whilst the closed strings allow oscillati<strong>on</strong>s in two directi<strong>on</strong>s, in thecase <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> open strings left- and right-movers need to combine into standing waves due toreflecti<strong>on</strong>s at their endpoints, hence leaving <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e set <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> coefficients.Dirichlet boundary c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>sThe wave equati<strong>on</strong>s for an open string satisfying Dirichlet boundary c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s can beexpanded as∑X µ (σ, τ) = x µ + w µ 1σ − l sn αµ ne −inτ sin(nσ), (2.39)with again µ ≠ 0. We need sin(nσ), and not cos (nσ), in order to accomodate thevanishing <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the oscillators in the endpoints. The c<strong>on</strong>stant w µ is called the windingnumber <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the string. Note thatn≠0X µ (σ = π, τ) − X µ (σ = 0, τ) = w µ π, (2.40)and hence w µ encodes the distance between both endpoints. We will come back to thiswhen we will c<strong>on</strong>sider T-duality and D-<strong>branes</strong>.Neumann boundary c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>sFor an open string satisfying Neumann boundary c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, the expansi<strong>on</strong> readsX µ (σ, τ) = x µ + l 2 sp µ τ + il s∑n≠01n αµ ne −inτ cos (nσ). (2.41)Note that this time we need cos (nσ), so that the ∂ σ derivatives will vanish at theendpoints. Also note that since no momentum can flow <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the ends <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the string, we canagain talk about a center <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> mass momentum p µ .This time, we can define the zero-mode asα µ 0 = l sp µ . (2.42)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!