Solomon Islands - Asia & the Pacific

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Solomon Islands: Analysis of Poverty from 2005/2006 HIESof the higher proportion of own-production in the food consumption of rural households compared to those inHoniara where most food is purchased; see Tables 5 to 8 following.46. For non-food expenditure rural households average weekly p.c.a.e. expenditure amounted to SBD37.06, but forthose in the lowest three deciles it amounted to only SBD11.18. This compared with the weekly average p.c.a.e.non-food expenditure for Honiara HH of SBD167.91, and for the lowest three deciles, SBD60.27.47. For non-food expenditure items therefore, the average Honiara HH spent 4.5 times as much on non-food items asthe average rural HH. For the lowest three deciles the gap was even wider at 5.4 times, with Honiara HH spendingan average of SBD60.27 p.c.a.e. weekly on non-food items compared to only SBD11.18 for rural HH. This is areflection not only of the higher costs of urban living, but also the lack of access to services in the rural areas.48. The patterns of food purchases and foodproduced for own consumption are shownin tables 5, 6 and 7, and in Chart 1. Thesetables and Chart provide greater detail on thecomposition of household food expenditurepatterns, and clearly demonstrate theimportance of home production for ruralhouseholds. Conversely it also illustrates theweakening food security situation for thoseliving in the urban centres. If imports of foodare disrupted, or supplies from the rural areasinto the urban markets are curtailed, a severefood shortage could rapidly eventuate.Per capita HH expendituredecilesPer capita HH expendituredecilesTable 5Food purchases by HouseholdSBD per capita adult equivalent per week per HHTable 6Food Produced for Own ConsumptionSBD per capita adult equivalent per week per HH49. Table 5 shows that food purchased by the Average all Households 29.567.3711.91 33.78average rural household amounted toLowest Quintile 14.872.955.8714.39SBD23.86 p.c.a.e. compared to SBD78.89purchased by the average Honiara HH, a ratioLowest Three DecilesHighest Quintile17.5146.233.1611.108.0220.9816.9372.58of 3.3. For those in the lowest three deciles however the amounts were SBD8.43 and SBD45.58 for rural and HoniaraHH respectively, a ratio of 5.4.NationalAverage all Households 32.34Lowest Quintile 7.58Lowest Three Deciles 9.49Highest Quintile 86.24NationalHoniara78.8939.7845.58145.78HoniaraProvincial -Urban59.3134.5336.3369.04Provincial -UrbanRural23.866.488.4362.47Rural50. The corollary of this is illustrated inTable 6. The average rural HH producedfood for own consumption valued atSBD33.78 p.c.a.e. compared to only Per capita HH expendituredecilesSBD7.37 for Honiara HH. For thoseHH in the lowest three deciles thecomparative amounts were SBD16.93p.c.a.e. and SBD3.16 respectively. Thelow level of own production and heavyreliance on purchased food in the urban centre of Honiara is clear.Table 7Proportion of Own Production in Food Consumption% of total food consumedNationalAverage all Households 47.8Lowest Quintile 66.2Lowest Three Deciles 64.9Highest Quintile 34.9Honiara8.56.96.57.1Provincial -Urban16.714.518.117.9Rural58.669.066.853.716Estimation of National Poverty Lines and Poverty Incidence
Solomon Islands: Analysis of Poverty from 2005/2006 HIES51. Table 7 and Chart 1 show theproportion of own production in foodconsumption for the three regionsand the overall national average.The difference in the level of thecontribution of own production to foodconsumption between the rural andurban areas is striking. More so perhapswhen also considering that the “farmgate”prices used in estimating ruralfood values are much lower than thoseused in valuing home production ofHoniara households.% of food expenditure80706050403020100Chart 1Proportion of Own Production in Food ConsumptionNational Honiara Provincial - Urban RuralAverage all Households Lowest Quintile Lowest Three Deciles Highest Quintile52. The relative proportions of food and non-food expenditure are shown in Table 8 and Chart 2. This illustrates veryclearly the changing pattern of food and non-food expenditure in total expenditure between rural and urban HHand between the differing levels of expenditure as discussed in the previous paragraphs.53. This pattern of higher proportional food expenditure in the rural areas compared to the urban areas is to beexpected and is common to other regional countries. Urban living inevitably involves greater non-food expenditure;many rural households will not have power, water or communications bills to pay. They will often spend less ontransport and housing costs. Thus their need for non-food expenditure is less. Moreover, since rural cash incomesare lower, the resources available for non-food expenditure is less.Table 8Proportion of Household Food Non-Food ExpenditureNational Honiara Provincial - Urban Rural Areas% of total expenditure Food Non-Food FoodNon-Food Food Non-Food Food Non-FoodAverage all HouseholdsLowest QuintileLowest Three Deciles59.9 40.1 38.1 61.9 38.6 61.4 60.9 39.168.4 31.6 44.6 55.4 54.9 45.1 68.3 31.768.8 31.2 44.7 55.3 53.5 46.5 69.4 30.6Highest Quintile 40.259.8 24.1 75.9 25.1 74.9 53.3 46.7Basic Needs Factor 0.45 1.24 0.87 0.4480Chart 2Proportion of HH Food & Non-Food Expenditure7060% of total expenditure50403020100FoodNon-Food Food Non-Food Food Non-Food Food Non-FoodNational Honiara Provincial - Urban Rural AreasAverage all Households Lowest Quintile Lowest Three Deciles Highest QuintileEstimation of National Poverty Lines and Poverty Incidence17
Page 1 and 2: Solomon IslandsANALYSIS OF THE 2005
Page 3 and 4: Solomon Islands: Analysis of Povert
Page 64: Solomon Islands: Analysis of Povert

Solomon Islands - Asia & the Pacific

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?