08.09.2015 Views

CRACK CAPITALISM

Holloway - Crack Capitalism

Holloway - Crack Capitalism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

We are forced back and back to the same question: why is it<br />

that the two-fold character of labour, to which Marx attached<br />

such importance, effectively disappeared from the discussion of<br />

Capital and from the communist movement? Why is the category<br />

of useful labour (or doing) effectively suppressed? This was not<br />

because the authors in question had not read Marx carefully<br />

enough or reflected on the text. To find an explanation we must<br />

look to the development of class struggle itself.<br />

2. THE THEORETICAL SUPPRESSION OF THE ANTAGONISM<br />

BETWEEN DOING AND LABOUR IS A MOMENT OFTHE<br />

DOMINANCE IN PRACTICE OFTHE STRUGGLE OF<br />

ABSTRACT LABOUR.<br />

To understand the effective suppression of the category of<br />

concrete labour to describe an activity both subordinated and<br />

antagonistic to abstract labour, it is necessary to distinguish<br />

between two levels of struggle, those which we signalled already<br />

in the previous thesis.<br />

First, there is the conflict which we have emphasised<br />

throughout this book, and which Marx portrayed as 'the pivot<br />

on which a clear comprehension of Political Economy turns'<br />

(186711 965: 41; 1867/1990: 132), that is, the conflict between<br />

abstract labour and creative or purposeful doing. This is an irreconcilable<br />

conflict. Conscious doing is the negation of abstract<br />

labour, while the abstraction of labour is the subordination<br />

of conscious doing to production for the market: on the one<br />

hand, the potentially socially self-determined doing, on the other,<br />

labour subject to alien determination.<br />

This abstraction of doing into labour generates a second level<br />

of conflict, that between labour and capital. Abstract labour is<br />

generalised as a principle of social activity only when labour<br />

power is converted into a commodity and there is a generalisation<br />

of the wage relation, and therefore of exploitation. We<br />

generally experience the loss of control over our own activity<br />

not as a direct result of selling our products on the market, but<br />

rather as a result of the fact that we have to sell our capacity<br />

to labour in return for a wage and perform the labour that is<br />

154

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!