CRACK CAPITALISM

Criticism restores the subject to the centre. By criticising,
humans say 'We are the negated creators, but we reject that
negation. All social phenomena exist because we have made
them: money or the state are just as much human products as
the motor-car. They depend on our creation for their existence.
And if we made them, we can change them.'
There is still a question, though. We have created the social
world around us, but are we stuck with our own creations
(Frankenstein), or do they depend on our constant re-creation
(Borges)? Do we have to make a distinction between some
creations (for example, the state or money) and others (the
car, say)?
Money is a form of social relations, a way in which we relate
to one another. When we buy something and pay for it with
money, we establish a certain form of relation with the producer
of the thing we buy. If we steal the thing, we establish a different
sort of relation with her, and if we receive it as a present yet
another, different relation. The sort of relationship we establish
does not depend either on the thing bought, stolen, or received,
nor on the materiality of any money involved (notes or coins).
When we say that money is a form of social relations, we say,
then, that it is a form that we create and re-create, a form that
depends not just on our initial creation but on our constant
re-creation. The same can be said of the state or capital.
Is a car also a form of social relations that we constantly
create and re-create? Clearly, cars have a certain materiality,
as indeed money has a certain materiality. However, the car is
also a way in which we relate to other people - to the workers
who produced it, when we buy it, but also to the people around
us, our family and friends, people in the street or in the town,
when we use it. We could use it as a sculpture or for planting
flowers, in which case we would no longer be re-creating the
social relations indicated by the concept of 'car'.
To put it in different terms: criticism is the recovery of verbs.
Our vision of the world is dominated by nouns, by things:
money, state, car, wall, computer, food, and so on. The: doing,
creating, painting, cooking, organising, bricklaying, teaching,
and so on are forgotten. Each noun implies the suppression
231