08.09.2015 Views

CRACK CAPITALISM

Holloway - Crack Capitalism

Holloway - Crack Capitalism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Thompson, as we have seen, shows how the struggle to<br />

establish capitalism involved a long struggle to impose a new<br />

concept of time. Class struggle was the struggle between two<br />

times, between two concepts and practices of time: the one<br />

centred on us, our doing, our living, and the other a quantitative,<br />

measured, objective time that abstracts completely from our lives<br />

and concerns. Thompson argues that, as capitalism becomes<br />

established, at least in the more 'advanced' countries, there<br />

is a widespread internalisation of abstract time, that struggle<br />

becomes focused on quantitative issues of time rather than on<br />

the quality of time itself. However, after emphasising the role of<br />

Puritanism in imposing the internalisation of clock-time, he asks:<br />

If Puritanism was a necessary part of the work-ethos which enabled the<br />

industrialised world to break out of the poverty-stricken economies of<br />

the past, will the Puritan evaluation of time begin to decompose as the<br />

pressures of poverty relax? Is it decomposing already? Will men begin to<br />

lose that restless urgency, that desire to consume time purposively, which<br />

most people carry just as they carry a watch on their wrists? 1[1967: 95)<br />

And he continues: 'But if the purposive notation of time-use<br />

becomes less compulsive, then men might have to re-Iearn some<br />

of the arts of living lost in the industrial revolution: how to<br />

fill the interstices of their days with enriched, more leisurely,<br />

personal and social relations; how to break down once more<br />

the barriers between work and life' (ibid.).<br />

Is there, then, a decomposition of clock-time? If so, why? Is it<br />

because of a relaxation of the pressures of poverty, as Thompson<br />

suggests, or some other reason? What would a decomposition<br />

of clock-time mean? Thompson suggests that a central element<br />

would be a breaking down of the barriers between work and<br />

life. This, however, could be seen in quite a different sense,<br />

as the extension of the dominion of clock-time. In this sense,<br />

Virno, Hardt and Negri argue that there is an extension of the<br />

discipline of labour time to the whole 24 hours of the day: 'For<br />

the post-Fordist multitude every qualitative difference between<br />

labour time and non-labour time falls short.'l Where does that<br />

leave us?<br />

228

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!