CRACK CAPITALISM

:1 binary gender divide between men and women is the product
of the abstraction of doing into labour. In this sense, the conflict
between doing and labour is prior to other conflicts.19
We are doers-against-Iabour, the true proletariat. We are
doers-against-Iabour, shadows-against-masks. Whether workers
or capitalists, women or men, black or white, we are self-divided,
self-antagonistic, although the intensity and nature of the
antagonism differs according to the role we reject or accept,
or reject-and-accept. We are fragile, unstable, situationally or
temporally schizophrenic. We adopt one personality in one
situation, another in a different situation. At one moment,
we are a doer in revolt against labour; at another, we are a
meek, obedient labourer. This changeableness, often viewed as
abnormality or even as betrayal of the movement, is in fact quite
normal. The antagonism between doing and labour is constantly
shifting. We are all self-antagonistic, but the antagonism is not
stable over time: certain situations (the composition of social
relations around us) bring out one or another side of this
antagonism. Thus, military training is designed to strengthen
the character mask and suppress any kind of hidden impulse
towards humanity, and the army is a situation that strengthens
this process. The same can be said of factory discipline and
the factory, and indeed of any kind of institutional discipline
and of any institution. The party too: the revolutionary party
creates situations or contexts in which we adopt a certain role or
character mask and suppress our drive towards creative doing.
(This role, this character mask of the professional revolutionary
or militant is now in crisis.)
Does this mean that any form of institutionalisation creates a
role, a character mask that disfigures and freezes? The doer-inrevolt,
the rebel, the angry-young-man, the feminist, can easily
become a role, an image that freezes and defines the shadowy
figure that moves behind. The struggle against the role can be
seen as a struggle for authenticity, but authenticity can itself
become a role, a new identity that freezes.2o Capitalist society,
a society characterised by the abstraction of doing into labour,
constantly generates these roles and throws them upon us - there
goes the revolutionary theorist, there is the militant. We want to
oppose them with authenticity, genuineness, to give body to the
223