Product Liability 2009 - Arnold & Porter LLP
Product Liability 2009 - Arnold & Porter LLP
Product Liability 2009 - Arnold & Porter LLP
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Lovells Hong Kong<br />
6.6 Do special rules apply to the settlement of<br />
claims/proceedings e.g. is court approval required for the<br />
settlement of group/class actions, or claims by infants, or<br />
otherwise?<br />
Court approval is required for the settlement of claims by infants or<br />
mentally incapacitated persons and a special procedure applies for<br />
approval to be obtained. Otherwise, there are no special rules<br />
applying to the settlement of claims in general and a party is free to<br />
settle a dispute without the approval of the court.<br />
6.7 Can Government authorities concerned with health and<br />
social security matters claim from any damages awarded<br />
or settlements paid to the Claimant without admission of<br />
liability reimbursement of treatment costs, unemployment<br />
benefits or other costs paid by the authorities to the<br />
Claimant in respect of the injury allegedly caused by the<br />
product. If so, who has responsibility for the repayment of<br />
such sums?<br />
No. There is no legal provision by which Government authorities<br />
concerned with health and social security matters can make such a<br />
claim.<br />
7 Costs / Funding<br />
7.1 Can the successful party recover: (a) court fees or other<br />
incidental expenses; (b) their own legal costs of bringing<br />
the proceedings, from the losing party?<br />
Yes. The court will usually order the losing party to pay the costs<br />
(including court fees and legal costs) of the successful party.<br />
7.2 Is public funding e.g. legal aid, available?<br />
Yes, public funding is available.<br />
7.3 If so, are there any restrictions on the availability of public<br />
funding?<br />
Legal aid will be granted if the applicant is able to satisfy the<br />
statutory criteria as to the financial eligibility and the merits for<br />
bringing the legal proceedings.<br />
ICLG TO: PRODUCT LIABILITY <strong>2009</strong><br />
© Published and reproduced with kind permission by Global Legal Group Ltd, London<br />
7.4 Is funding allowed through conditional or contingency fees<br />
and, if so, on what conditions?<br />
No, such funding is not allowed.<br />
7.5 Is third party funding of claims permitted and, if so, on<br />
what basis may funding be provided?<br />
Third party funding of claims is, in principle, not allowed for<br />
reasons of public policy. This prohibition has relaxed over time to<br />
allow the notion of common interest to enable the funding of claims<br />
by third parties, for example, in circumstances where legal aid is<br />
available, where trade unions use the support of their union or<br />
policyholders are indemnified by their insurer.<br />
8 Updates<br />
8.1 Please provide, in no more than 300 words, a summary of<br />
any new cases, trends and developments in <strong>Product</strong><br />
<strong>Liability</strong> Law in Hong Kong.<br />
The Law Reform Commission of Hong Kong issued a “Report on<br />
Civil <strong>Liability</strong> for Unsafe <strong>Product</strong>s” in December 1997 to consider<br />
the reform of the existing law governing compensation for personal<br />
injury and damage to property caused by defective or unsafe goods.<br />
The Report recommended giving consumers the right to hold<br />
manufacturers, producers, own-branders, importers, wholesalers,<br />
distributors and retailers jointly and severally liable for defective or<br />
unsafe products. The Report also recommended that consumers<br />
should have the right to recover losses arising out of damage to the<br />
defective product itself. There is however currently no legislative<br />
action to implement such recommendations.<br />
The Law Reform Commission also established a sub-committee in<br />
November 2006 to consider whether a scheme for class actions<br />
should be introduced in Hong Kong. Publication of the report of the<br />
sub-committee is awaited.<br />
WWW.ICLG.CO.UK 171<br />
Hong Kong