Product Liability 2009 - Arnold & Porter LLP
Product Liability 2009 - Arnold & Porter LLP
Product Liability 2009 - Arnold & Porter LLP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Lovells <strong>LLP</strong> The EU General <strong>Product</strong> Safety Regime<br />
Pan-European notification<br />
If the potentially unsafe product has been marketed in more than<br />
one Member State, the producer or distributor is faced with the<br />
prospect of having to give a notification “immediately” to the<br />
national authorities in up to 25 Member States (see the sections on<br />
“Co-ordinate notification action” and “Guidance for Pan-<br />
European notification” below).<br />
Although not envisaged in the Directive or fully reflected in the<br />
implementing legislation in any Member State, the guidelines<br />
suggest a procedure whereby a producer or distributor may notify<br />
only the authority in the Member State in which they are<br />
established, provided either the risk is notified as being a “serious<br />
risk” or is otherwise considered a serious risk by the receiving<br />
authority, or that authority has agreed with the producer or<br />
distributor to notify the authorities in the other Member States.<br />
As this procedure has not been given full effect in the implementing<br />
laws in the Member States, if a producer or distributor chose to use<br />
this single notification procedure, rather than directly contacting the<br />
authorities in each Member State, it could give rise to a breach of<br />
the Member State’s local laws on notification. Some national<br />
enforcement authorities have indicated that they would accept this<br />
single notification procedure as satisfying the notification<br />
obligation. However, whilst businesses may be able to discharge<br />
their obligations in most Member States by following the single<br />
notification procedure, rather than informing each Member State<br />
authority directly, they should nevertheless be advised of the<br />
practical risks in following this “short-cut”.<br />
The main risk, from a practical perspective, of following the single<br />
notification procedure arises from the fact that, whilst it offers the<br />
possibility of a centralised process for notification, there is no<br />
current procedure for centralised enforcement. If the producer does<br />
not make the effort to establish direct contact at a local level with<br />
the authorities who will be making decisions about enforcement,<br />
the enforcement authority may initiate its own investigation in the<br />
local market. Often this will involve the authorities directly<br />
contacting customers and local distributors, and they will make<br />
decisions about enforcement based on whatever information such<br />
investigations may reveal. This makes it impossible for a producer<br />
dealing with a pan-European safety issue to have any confidence in<br />
its ability to control the issue in the various countries, which could<br />
have damaging implications for the reputation of the producer, and<br />
could undermine the key objectives of any corrective action being<br />
undertaken.<br />
The Commission has been considering options for introducing a<br />
technical solution to enable pan-European communications to take<br />
place more effectively, quickly and reliably. In this regard the<br />
Commission has been in the process of setting up a new internet<br />
application - Business Application - to enable producers and<br />
distributors to send the notification form to the competent authorities<br />
of all EU Member States via the Internet. The Business Application<br />
system is to become operable on 4 May <strong>2009</strong> and guidance was<br />
published by the Commission in April on preparation and submission<br />
of the form: http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/safety/rapex/docs/<br />
manual_form_business_app.pdf. The form is available in five<br />
languages, namely English, French, German, Italian and Spanish. If<br />
the notification is to be sent to any Member States that do not work<br />
in one of those languages, the producer or distributor will need to<br />
prepare and attach relevant translations. It should also be noted that<br />
this system still will not include any provision for enforcement<br />
decisions, and will therefore not release prudent producers and<br />
distributors of the need to establish a direct local point of contact with<br />
the enforcement authority in each country.<br />
Risk Management<br />
ICLG TO: PRODUCT LIABILITY <strong>2009</strong><br />
© Published and reproduced with kind permission by Global Legal Group Ltd, London<br />
Effective risk management is crucial to ensuring that as far as<br />
possible products are safe, and that a company responds effectively<br />
under the Directive to any safety problems that arise after the<br />
product has been put into circulation. A risk management system<br />
should cover all stages of the production process including design,<br />
manufacture, production, testing (including equipment testing),<br />
packaging, storage, distribution and post-marketing surveillance.<br />
There are a number of important steps that manufacturers or<br />
suppliers should take as part of a basic risk management system to<br />
help meet the new Directive’s requirements.<br />
<strong>Product</strong> safety review team<br />
A product safety review team should be set up to co-ordinate a<br />
comprehensive risk management programme. The members of<br />
such a team should be drawn from all relevant sections of the<br />
organisation. The team should meet regularly and have authority to<br />
take any necessary action.<br />
The review team’s main function would be to ensure that the basic<br />
product safety procedures are maintained and that problems are<br />
dealt with effectively.<br />
The review team would need to review safety and quality control<br />
procedures, devise a product recall plan, and, in the event of a safety<br />
problem, be in a position to assess the scale and seriousness of the<br />
risk and respond accordingly. This will involve ensuring that<br />
internal and external advisers with appropriate experience can be<br />
quickly called in to deal urgently with potential risks that might<br />
arise. The review team will also need to nominate individuals as<br />
contact points for the regulators, and keep comprehensive<br />
information on distributors, retailers and customers of each product<br />
should a recall be required.<br />
Terms and conditions<br />
The law permits a degree of flexibility as to the terms on which<br />
manufacturers, distributors and retailers may apportion risk among<br />
themselves in relation to product liability issues. Appropriately<br />
drafted warranties and indemnities can go a considerable way<br />
towards achieving this and at the same time assist in mounting an<br />
appropriate defence in proceedings. Systems should therefore be in<br />
place to ensure that a company’s terms of business are properly<br />
incorporated into contracts and are assessed and reviewed<br />
periodically.<br />
Post-market surveillance<br />
Producers must ensure they take adequate steps to monitor the<br />
safety of their products, even after they have been marketed (Article<br />
5(1)). This may include systems for sample testing of marketed<br />
products, maintaining a register of consumer complaints, and<br />
establishing systems to ensure good communication of information<br />
about potential risks between the producer and distributors.<br />
Instructions and warnings<br />
Companies must ensure that instructions and warnings are<br />
communicated effectively to consumers whether by labelling,<br />
package inserts or other means. This may involve warning product<br />
users of newly identified risks after the product has been sold. The<br />
style of packaging as well as its physical characteristics can affect<br />
WWW.ICLG.CO.UK 19