07.12.2012 Views

"Mostly Propaganda in Nature:" Kim Il Sung, the Juche Ideology, and ...

"Mostly Propaganda in Nature:" Kim Il Sung, the Juche Ideology, and ...

"Mostly Propaganda in Nature:" Kim Il Sung, the Juche Ideology, and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

"<strong>Mostly</strong> <strong>Propag<strong>and</strong>a</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Nature</strong>:" <strong>Kim</strong> <strong>Il</strong> <strong>Sung</strong>, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Juche</strong> <strong>Ideology</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Second Korean War<br />

NKIDP Work<strong>in</strong>g Paper #3<br />

militaristic.<br />

Evacuation of <strong>the</strong> population, adm<strong>in</strong>istrative <strong>in</strong>stitutions, <strong>in</strong>dustries, <strong>and</strong><br />

factories of Pyongyang began.<br />

At <strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>the</strong> leadership of <strong>the</strong> DPRK took one more step that alarmed us.<br />

On 31 January 1968, <strong>Kim</strong> <strong>Il</strong> <strong>Sung</strong> addressed an official letter to Comrade Kosyg<strong>in</strong>, <strong>the</strong> head<br />

of <strong>the</strong> USSR Council of M<strong>in</strong>isters. This letter said that “Johnson’s clique could at any time<br />

engage <strong>in</strong> a military adventure <strong>in</strong> [North] Korea,” that <strong>the</strong> policy of <strong>the</strong> American<br />

imperialists “is a rude challenge to <strong>the</strong> DPRK <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Union of Soviet Socialist Republics,<br />

who are bound toge<strong>the</strong>r by allied relations accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> treaty of friendship, co‐<br />

operation <strong>and</strong> mutual assistance; [it is] a serious threat to <strong>the</strong> security of all socialist<br />

countries <strong>and</strong> to peace <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> entire world”.<br />

This message fur<strong>the</strong>r officially <strong>in</strong>formed <strong>the</strong> Soviet government on behalf of <strong>the</strong><br />

government of <strong>the</strong> DPRK that <strong>the</strong>y were “forced to conduct preparations to give <strong>the</strong><br />

aggression an appropriate rebuff” <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> letter expressed confidence that “<strong>in</strong> case of <strong>the</strong><br />

creation of a state of war <strong>in</strong> [North] Korea as a result of a military attack by <strong>the</strong> American<br />

imperialists, <strong>the</strong> Soviet government <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> fraternal Soviet people will fight toge<strong>the</strong>r with<br />

us aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> aggressors…”<br />

<strong>Kim</strong> <strong>Il</strong> <strong>Sung</strong>’s letter ended with a proposal: <strong>in</strong> case such a situation materialized,<br />

“ [you should] provide us, without delay, military <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r aid <strong>and</strong> support, to mobilize all<br />

means available.”<br />

M atters took a serious turn.<br />

An official communication along government l<strong>in</strong>es, bypass<strong>in</strong>g comradely<br />

consultations along party l<strong>in</strong>es, which are usual <strong>in</strong> such cases, spoke to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tention of <strong>the</strong><br />

North Korean leadership to b<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union somehow, us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> existence of <strong>the</strong><br />

treaty between <strong>the</strong> USSR <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> DPRK as a pretext to <strong>in</strong>volve us <strong>in</strong> support<strong>in</strong>g such plans<br />

of <strong>the</strong> North Korean friends about which we knew noth<strong>in</strong>g. The CC Politburo believed that<br />

<strong>the</strong> time had come to state our attitude clearly to <strong>the</strong> North Korean comrades regard<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong>se questions <strong>and</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> peculiarities of <strong>the</strong>ir policies that concern our country.<br />

Without giv<strong>in</strong>g an official reply to <strong>Kim</strong> <strong>Il</strong> <strong>Sung</strong>’s message, we addressed a<br />

communication to him, ask<strong>in</strong>g him to come to Moscow for a comprehensive exchange of<br />

op<strong>in</strong>ions regard<strong>in</strong>g this situation which has emerged. Comrade <strong>Kim</strong> <strong>Il</strong> <strong>Sung</strong> replied that, at<br />

<strong>the</strong> present time, circumstances did not permit him to leave <strong>the</strong> country. Member of <strong>the</strong><br />

KWP CC Politburo, Deputy Premier <strong>and</strong> M<strong>in</strong>ister of Defense <strong>Kim</strong> Jangbong was <strong>in</strong>stead<br />

dispatched to Moscow for <strong>the</strong> celebrations of <strong>the</strong> 50th anniversary of <strong>the</strong> Soviet army.<br />

On <strong>the</strong> Politburo’s <strong>in</strong>structions, I received <strong>Kim</strong> Jangbong on 26 February 1968 <strong>and</strong><br />

had a lo ng discussion with him, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> course of which I expressed <strong>in</strong> all earnestness our<br />

position on a series of important questions.<br />

He was told that we still do not depart from <strong>the</strong> assumption that <strong>the</strong> Korean<br />

comrades ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a course for <strong>the</strong> peaceful unification of Korea, for we are not aware of<br />

any changes to this course. In any case, under <strong>the</strong> current circumstances, we are aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> matter towards unleash<strong>in</strong>g a war, though we fully underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> desire of <strong>the</strong><br />

DPRK to streng<strong>the</strong>n its own defense, <strong>and</strong> we actively support this. We do not underst<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation that reached us regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> evacuation of Pyongyang. We<br />

have no <strong>in</strong>formation from our North Korean friends regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir talks with <strong>the</strong><br />

Americans <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> aims of <strong>the</strong>se talks.<br />

www.wilsoncenter.org/nkidp<br />

96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!