NORTH KOREA INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTATION PROJECT WORKING PAPERS SERIES Christian F. Ostermann, Series Editor #1 Charles K. Armstrong, “<strong>Juche</strong> <strong>and</strong> North Korea’s Global Aspirations” #2 Bernd Schaefer, “Overconfidence Shattered: North Korean Unification Policy, 1971-1975” #3 Mitchell Lerner, “’<strong>Mostly</strong> <strong>Propag<strong>and</strong>a</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Nature</strong>:’ <strong>Kim</strong> <strong>Il</strong> <strong>Sung</strong>, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Juche</strong> <strong>Ideology</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Second Korean War”
"<strong>Mostly</strong> <strong>Propag<strong>and</strong>a</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Nature</strong>:" <strong>Kim</strong> <strong>Il</strong> <strong>Sung</strong>, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Juche</strong> <strong>Ideology</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Second Korean War The Key Question Mitchell Lerner 1 "The key question," asked <strong>the</strong> New York Times on January 28, 1968, "is why did <strong>the</strong>y do it?" 2 The Times was referr<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> North Korean seizure of <strong>the</strong> USS Pueblo <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sea of Japan five days earlier, an event that left one American sailor dead <strong>and</strong> eighty-two o<strong>the</strong>rs held captive <strong>in</strong> prison camps of <strong>the</strong> Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) for almost a year. Still, <strong>the</strong> question could have been applied to North Korean behavior dur<strong>in</strong>g much of <strong>the</strong> late 1960s, as <strong>the</strong> Pueblo attack was just one <strong>in</strong> a series of aggressive North Korean military actions dur<strong>in</strong>g this period. Earlier <strong>in</strong> January 1968, a group of 31 DPRK soldiers crossed <strong>the</strong> DMZ on a mission to assass<strong>in</strong>ate ROK President Park Chung Hee, which culm<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> a series of gun battles <strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> around Seoul. Less dramatic but equally troubl<strong>in</strong>g signs of <strong>in</strong>creased North Korean belligerency could be found well before <strong>the</strong>se two events. In 1966, military <strong>in</strong>cidents along <strong>the</strong> DMZ had caused just 42 American <strong>and</strong> South Korean casualties; <strong>the</strong> first n<strong>in</strong>e months of 1967 saw <strong>the</strong> number rise to almost 300. 3 Suddenly, American troops assigned to South Korea rout<strong>in</strong>ely found <strong>the</strong>ir tours of duty extended to meet <strong>the</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g danger, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Jo<strong>in</strong>t Chiefs of Staff quietly re- classified <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn part of South Korea as a hostile fire zone, mak<strong>in</strong>g troops stationed <strong>the</strong>re 1 The author wishes to thank Bruce Cum<strong>in</strong>gs, James Matray, Nicholas Evan Sarantakes, Jeremi Suri, <strong>and</strong> Balazs Szalontai for <strong>the</strong>ir valuable assistance <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> preparation of this paper. Special thanks are due to James Person of <strong>the</strong> North Korean International Documentation Project for his advice, support, <strong>and</strong> patience throughout <strong>the</strong> process, <strong>and</strong> to <strong>the</strong> Cold War International History Project <strong>and</strong> its director, Christian Ostermann, for all of its contributions to <strong>the</strong> study of <strong>in</strong>ternational history. 2 New York Times, January 28, 1968, p. E1. 3 The estimated number of military <strong>in</strong>cidents actually vary by source, but <strong>the</strong>re is no doubt that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease was substantial. These estimates, which are actually fairly conservative, come from "Mr. Bundy's Meet<strong>in</strong>g with Mr. Colby, September 15, 1967," memor<strong>and</strong>um of conversation, September 15, 1967, Foreign Relations of <strong>the</strong> United States, 1964–1968
Volume XXIX, Part 1, Korea, document #127, note #3. www.wilsoncenter.org/nkidp