17.02.2016 Views

Interventions to build resilience among young people A literature review

Interventions-to-build-resilience-among-young-people

Interventions-to-build-resilience-among-young-people

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Attachment and Bio-behavioral Catch-up (ABC) – designed <strong>to</strong> help caregivers facilitate<br />

healthy regulation of their child’s behavioural and stress responses, by teaching caregivers<br />

<strong>to</strong> be highly responsive <strong>to</strong> the child’s emotions and increasing caregivers’ provision of<br />

nurturing care and promotion of attachment security.<br />

Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care for Preschoolers (MTFC-P) – uses a behaviour<br />

management approach and intensively trains, supervises and supports foster caregivers <strong>to</strong><br />

provide positive adult support and consistent limit setting.<br />

Bucharest Early Intervention Project (BEIP) – foster caregivers received ongoing support<br />

from social workers in managing challenging behaviour, encouraging child-centred parenting<br />

and organising a support group. The intervention was focused on developing attachment<br />

relationships, facilitating language development and providing foster parents with<br />

techniques for managing difficult child behaviour.<br />

Specific middle childhood interventions producing positive outcomes include:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Incredible Years (IY) – modified version incorporated a co-parenting component between<br />

foster and biological caregivers <strong>to</strong> expand their knowledge of each other and their child,<br />

practice open communication and negotiate inter-parental conflict (regarding family<br />

visitation, family routines and discipline)<br />

Keeping Foster Parents Trained and Supported (KEEP) – training, supervision and support <strong>to</strong><br />

foster parents in applying behaviour management strategies<br />

Middle School Success (MSS) – derivative of KEEP specifically targeting youth exiting primary<br />

school. Foster caregiver sessions were group based and behaviour management oriented;<br />

youth sessions were group based (summer) and individually based (school year) and were<br />

oriented <strong>to</strong>ward skill <strong>build</strong>ing<br />

Fostering Individualized Assistance Program (FIAP) – focused on wrapping services around<br />

the child based on their individual and family needs with the goal of improving placement<br />

stability and reducing behaviour and emotional problems. Intervention had four<br />

components: strength-based assessment, life-domain planning, clinical case management<br />

and follow-along supports and services.<br />

One adolescent intervention was reported <strong>to</strong> produce positive outcomes:<br />

<br />

Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care for Adolescents (MTFC-A) – multicomponent<br />

program that involves individual placement (for six <strong>to</strong> nine months) with a specialised foster<br />

family (i.e. intensively trained, supervised and supported <strong>to</strong> provide positive adult support<br />

and men<strong>to</strong>ring, close supervision and consistent limit setting).<br />

Stewart and Wang’s (2012) <strong>review</strong>, ranked as low quality, focused on the Health-Promoting School<br />

(HPS) approach, the precise details of which are unclear. However, the authors indicate that the<br />

approach is holistic, integrating health in<strong>to</strong> the curriculum; underpinned by Bronfenbrenner’s (1989)<br />

ecological theory; and supported by the World Health Organization. HPS also recognises the<br />

significance of school-based health policies, links with health services and partnerships between the<br />

school, the family and community. The authors conclude that the evidence related <strong>to</strong> HPS is limited<br />

but promising.<br />

Brunwasser et al. (2009) conducted a moderate quality meta-analysis of the Penn Resiliency<br />

Program (PRP), which is one of the most widely researched depression prevention programs and is<br />

<strong>Interventions</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>build</strong> <strong>resilience</strong> <strong>among</strong> <strong>young</strong> <strong>people</strong>: a <strong>literature</strong> <strong>review</strong> 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!