23.02.2016 Views

Semantics

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PARADIGMATIC RELATIONS II 139<br />

a. relation of dominance<br />

b. relation of differentiation.<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D E F G<br />

In this taxonomy the relation of dominance is the one that holds<br />

between A and B, A and C, B and D, B and E, C and F, C and G. The<br />

relation of difference is the one that holds between B and C, D and E, and<br />

F and G.<br />

In a well-formed hierarchy the branches never come together again<br />

as one descends the hierarchy. That is, its main formation rules stipulates<br />

that for any element in the hierarchy, except the highest, there is one and<br />

only one element which immediately dominates it.<br />

There are two main sorts of lexical hierarchies. On the one hand, there<br />

are taxonomic or classificatory hierarchies, in which the relation of<br />

dominance is taxonomy and the relation of differentiation is co-taxonomy.<br />

On the other hand, there are meronymic (or part-whole) hierarchies in<br />

which the relation of dominance is meronymy (or more accurately,<br />

holonymy) and the relation of differentiation is co-meronymy.<br />

6.1.2. Taxonomic hierarchies<br />

Taxonomic hierarchies are defined as classificatory systems, and they<br />

reflect the ways speakers of a language categorize the world of experience.<br />

A well ordered taxonomy shows a set of categories at different levels of<br />

specificity.<br />

From the different levels established, the basic level is the one which<br />

displays the richest sets of characteristic properties. This level maximizes<br />

two properties of “good” categories: resemblance between members and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!