Semantics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
140 BASIC SEMANTICS<br />
distinctiveness of members from those in sister categories. Cruse (1986)<br />
gives as a good example of a taxonomy, the tableware taxonomy. The<br />
following chart is an adaptation of his tableware taxonomy:<br />
tableware<br />
cutlery<br />
crokery<br />
table linen<br />
fork<br />
knife<br />
spoon<br />
cup<br />
plate<br />
bowl<br />
table cloth<br />
napkin<br />
tablespoon<br />
teaspoon<br />
soupspoon<br />
In this example, what Cruse calls substantive level is what cognitive<br />
psychologists call basic level, that is, the level displaying the richest set of<br />
characteristic or prototypical properties. Vocabulary items at levels below<br />
the basic level are more likely to be compound words than those at the<br />
basic level. In hierarchies where the basic-level items are count nouns,<br />
the items at higher levels are frequently mass nouns.<br />
6.1.3. Meronymic hierarchies<br />
In this type of hierarchy the relation of dominance is meronymy and<br />
the relation of differentiation is co-meronymy. The most popular example<br />
is the human body as seen from the outside.<br />
In relation to meronymy, the main difference between a taxonomy and<br />
a meronymy is the lack of clear generalized levels in the latter. For example,<br />
there is homology between arm and leg: knee corresponds to elbow, sole<br />
of foot to palm of hand and toes to fingers, but this does not extend to other<br />
parts of the body. For this reason, Cruse explains that there seems to be<br />
no equivalent to the basic level of a taxonomy.<br />
In hierarchies we can also find lexical gaps and contrastive aspects in<br />
different languages. Different languages do not always coincide in the<br />
structuring of the human body. We find lexical gaps when the division in<br />
one language is finer than the other.