23.02.2016 Views

Semantics

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

44 BASIC SEMANTICS<br />

Aristotle, on the other hand, proposed that we acquire knowledge by<br />

means of the information that we obtain through our five senses. English<br />

empiricism emphasized the importance of collecting and elaborating data<br />

about the world to build up knowledge.<br />

On the one hand, formal approaches to the study of language emphasize<br />

the idea that language is basically a human faculty or capacity, which indeed<br />

it is, usually avoiding the question of what this capacity is for.<br />

Functional approaches, on the other hand, emphasize the importance<br />

of the function of language, focusing on the idea that the organization of<br />

the linguistic system is based on its main aims, that is, communication<br />

and interaction. The different branches of functionalist theories share the<br />

idea that language is an instrument of social interaction among human<br />

beings (Dik 1989: 3) used with the intention of establishing communicative<br />

relationships. They also share the idea that the question of how a language<br />

is organized cannot be profitably studied in abstraction from the question<br />

of why it is organized the way it is, given the communicative functions which<br />

it fulfils (Dik 1989: 6). This definition reveals the instrumentality of language<br />

with respect to what people do and achieve in social interaction and it is<br />

also described (ibidem) as a structured, cooperative activity.<br />

Cognitivism (Langacker 1987: 13), claiming to be within the empiricist<br />

tradition, holds that there is no separation of linguistic knowledge from<br />

general knowledge and<br />

that even if the blueprints for language are wired genetically into the human<br />

organism, their elaboration into a fully specified linguistic system during<br />

language acquisition, and their implementation in everyday language use,<br />

are clearly dependent on experiential factors and inextricably bound up with<br />

psychological phenomena that are not specifically linguistic in character<br />

In connection with the idea of the instrumentality of language<br />

Cognitivism also claims that the lexicon, morphology, and syntax form a<br />

continuum of symbolic units serving to structure conceptual content for<br />

expressive purposes (Langacker 1987: 35).<br />

However, things in linguistics are not that clear cut and both rationalism<br />

and empiricism have contributed to the advance of science in general and<br />

linguistics in particular in many important ways. Cognitivism in particular<br />

has kept some Cartesian and Kantian contributions to the characteristics<br />

of mental elaborations and has emphasized the importance of symbolization<br />

processes in linguistic organization.<br />

There are some ideas that can help to identify the differences between<br />

a formal, rationalist tradition to linguistic analysis and a functional,<br />

empirically based linguistic tradition.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!