23.02.2016 Views

Semantics

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

74 BASIC SEMANTICS<br />

Saeed also touches the problem of the different ways of approaching<br />

the issue of defining meaning and how this influences other problems<br />

such as the difference between entailment and presupposition. He takes<br />

two approaches to presupposition.<br />

In the first approach, closely related to the philosophical tradition in<br />

the line of Frege, Russell, Wittgenstein etc, sentences are viewed as external<br />

objects where we don’t worry too much about the process of producing<br />

them, or the individuality of the speaker or writer and their context<br />

or their audience. Meaning is seen as an attribute of sentences rather<br />

than something construed by the participants. <strong>Semantics</strong>, then consists of<br />

relating a sentence-object to other sentence-objects and to the world.<br />

As above mentioned, another approach, also discussed by Saeed,<br />

views sentences as the utterances of individuals engaged in a communication<br />

act, where the aim is to identify the strategies that speakers and<br />

hearers use to communicate with one another. Then communication is<br />

seen from the speaker’s viewpoint and we talk about presupposition as<br />

part of the task of packaging an utterance; or we adopt the listener’s<br />

viewpoint and see presupposition as one of a number of inferences the listener<br />

might make on the basis of what the speaker has just said. Saeed<br />

then discusses the following example:<br />

i(i) John’s brother has just got back from Nigeria<br />

(ii) John has a brother<br />

and analyzes it as a truth relation in the following terms:<br />

Step 1: if p ( the presupposing sentence) is true then q ( the presupposed<br />

sentence) is true<br />

Step 2: if p is false, the q is still true<br />

Step 3: if q is true, p could be either true or false<br />

and produces a first truth table for presupposition<br />

p<br />

q<br />

T → T<br />

F → T<br />

T or F ← T<br />

discussing the table as follows: If it is true that John’s brother has just<br />

come back from Nigeria, it must be true that John has a brother. Similarly,<br />

if it is false that John’s brother has come back from Nigeria ( if he’s still<br />

there, for example), the presupposition that John has a brother still holds.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!