23.02.2016 Views

Semantics

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

148 BASIC SEMANTICS<br />

not definable by a set of necessary and sufficient criteria, but with fuzzy<br />

boundaries and graded typicality.<br />

Syntactic categories used to be defined syntactically but this criterion<br />

did not hold across languages since syntactic categories are not universal<br />

and equivalent.<br />

This lesson focusses on exemplifying how relevant grammatical<br />

meanings in categories such as number, gender, tense, aspect, voice and,<br />

very especially, functional roles, work in the English language.<br />

6.2.1. Grammatical meanings associated with nouns<br />

and verbs<br />

Following how Langacker, Cruse and others picture the difference<br />

between nouns, adjectives and verbs in terms of temporal stability, some<br />

conclusions can be drawn. All languages have a way of making a<br />

distinction between persistent entities, whose properties change relatively<br />

little over time, and highly time-sensitive experiences. However the most<br />

basic and more important difference can be established between entities<br />

and events, with nouns encoding entities and verbs encoding events.<br />

Grammatical meaning can be further divided into those meanings<br />

associated with nouns and those associated with verbs.<br />

6.2.1.1. Grammatical meanings associated with nouns<br />

Among grammatical meanings associated with nouns are definiteness,<br />

number, animacy, gender and functional roles.<br />

Definitness is a grammatical device associated with reference and<br />

deixis. It is codified by the presence or absence of the definite article.<br />

Number. The number system in English has only two terms: singular<br />

and plural, and plurality is not marked for gender. This contrasts with<br />

other languages which have specific forms for a dual plural, like Arabic.<br />

Gender is closely related to animacy in the first place, and then to sex.<br />

The English pronominal system (he, she, it) can be predicted on the basis<br />

of sex only and is only marked for gender in the singular. There is a range<br />

of arbitrariness vs. motivation for gender assignment in the different<br />

languages. An example of arbitrariness is the German words Löffel (“spoon”;<br />

masculine), Gabel (“fork”; feminine) and Messer (“knife”; neuter). In French<br />

and German there is a strong tendency for words referring to male beings

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!