23.02.2016 Views

Semantics

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

220 BASIC SEMANTICS<br />

Blending theory, was first formulated by Fauconnier and Turner (1994)<br />

and it is a relatively recent development in Cognitive Linguistics. There are<br />

two important concepts in this connection: mental space and blended space.<br />

This theory provides a new explanation of metaphorical phenomena. Mental<br />

spaces are small conceptual packets that we construct for the sake of<br />

conversation. Input spaces (which include both source and target domains)<br />

provide the basic material for metaphor interpretation. This information<br />

merges in the blended space, where additional information is created. This<br />

approach is also used to account for other cognitive linguistic phenomena<br />

like metonymy, referential opacity, and presupposition.<br />

Fauconnier’s main contribution explains how language users assign<br />

and manipulate reference, including the use of names, articles and<br />

pronouns. He focuses on the cognitive processes triggered during discourse<br />

by these linguistic structures and on how speakers and hearers keep track<br />

of the entities referred to in the language. His central idea is that when<br />

we use language we are constantly constructing domains.<br />

These domains in turn are like large areas of common reference. As<br />

an example, we take Saeed’s reference to Julius Caesar. If we talk about<br />

Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar, we can handle several relevant domains,<br />

or mental spaces. One domain is the world of the play, while another might<br />

be the real world, where Julius Caesar is a historically documented figure.<br />

We always make use of such division into domains and we use the same<br />

name Julius Caesar for both the historical figure and the character in the<br />

play. The process can be made more complex if we refer to the actor<br />

playing this part and say that Julius Caesar was too young. And made even<br />

more complicated if, seeing some children running off the foyer’s with a<br />

life-size figure of the actor in costume, we say, following Saeed’s example:<br />

Hey, they are stealing Julius Caesar. That is, we use the same name to refer<br />

to the historical person, a role in a play written about him, an actor playing<br />

that role and a figure of that actor playing the role. Fauconier’s mental<br />

spaces try to explain this kind of mental flexibility.<br />

Saeed compares this concept with the notion of possible worlds used<br />

in formal semantics where it is assumed that the speaker can divide up<br />

reality into separate domains of reference.<br />

10.6. LANGACKER´S COGNITIVE GRAMMAR<br />

Langacker´s cognitive grammar is possibly one of the most influential<br />

contributions to the area of cognitive linguistics in the last twenty years.<br />

One of his main tenets is the idea that there is no distinction between

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!