23.02.2016 Views

Semantics

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SEMANTICS AND RELATED DISCIPLINES II: SEMANTICS AND PRAGMATICS 99<br />

Some languages use certain morphological devices to mark focus and<br />

even complete words. Other languages, such as English, use syntactic<br />

devices in addition to intonation. The most common one is the use of<br />

cleft or pseudo-cleft sentences such as in:<br />

It was Mario who got the bank money.<br />

It was the bank money that Mario got.<br />

There are other resources that can be used to emphasize the topic in<br />

the discourse. Some are anaphora, using related lexemes, repetition of<br />

lexemes etc, and all of them create cohesion in the discourse as Halliday<br />

and Hasan (1976) first pointed out.<br />

4.8. REFERENCE AND CONTEXT<br />

Speakers calculate how much information their hearers need to make<br />

a successful reference because much of reference involves reliance on the<br />

context. For example, when shopping and ordeing fruits, the sentence<br />

I still need two more red ones<br />

where the client is referring to two more apples the context provides such<br />

information.<br />

These are called by Saeed and others “short hands” and they are<br />

sometimes grouped with metonymy.<br />

Saeed takes Clark’s example as follows:<br />

“…a hypothetical situation where someone wants to buy two bottles of<br />

Heineken lager. In a pub they might say Two bottles of Heineken, please!<br />

In a theatre bar, where only bottled beer is available, their order might be<br />

Two Heinekens, please! At a sponsor’s stall at an open air concert, which<br />

only serves Heineken beer in bottle and on draught they might say: Two<br />

bottles, please! If the stall only sold bottles, they might say Two please!. The<br />

point here is that the ordinary use of referring expressions involves<br />

calculation of retrievability, which takes account of contextual information.”<br />

4.9. INFERENCE<br />

In studying context and its role in the construction of meaning we<br />

have seen how listeners participate in the construction of meaning. One<br />

way of doing this is by using inferences to fill out the text to build up an<br />

interpretation of speaker meaning. Conversational inference and<br />

conversational implicature are ways of inferring meaning from a context.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!