23.02.2016 Views

Semantics

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PARADIGMATIC RELATIONS II 141<br />

body<br />

arm leg trunk head<br />

shoulder<br />

upper arm<br />

elbow<br />

lower arm<br />

wrist<br />

hand<br />

finger<br />

knuckle<br />

nail<br />

palm<br />

back<br />

We also find conceptual gaps in the case of a lack of Spanish or French<br />

term equivalent to the English nut, which includes walnuts, peanuts,<br />

almonds, etc., because there is not a natural category for such a thing in<br />

either language. Similarly, the English language has a three part category<br />

that includes animals (rabbits, frogs, and crocodiles), fish and birds, where<br />

the category animals excludes birds and fish.<br />

Here Cruse sustains that we have a conceptual gap. Maybe a French<br />

or Spanish term for [non-human, animate living on soil or earth] in<br />

contrast to [non-human, animate living on either water or air] would fill<br />

this gap? On the other hand, the Spanish meronymic hierarchy would<br />

include animal as the higher level term.<br />

6.1.4. Linear structures<br />

Other lexical structures include linear structures. These, in turn, also<br />

include chains and grids. In bipolar chains, the scale on which a pair of<br />

opposites operates is often host to a number of terms which denote<br />

different degrees of a property. The most frequent pattern is one in which<br />

there are implicit superlative terms at each end of the scale, such as in:<br />

Minuscule, tiny, small, large, huge, gigantic<br />

By contrast, in monopolar chains there is no sense that the ends of the<br />

scale are oriented in opposite directions. According to Cruse (1986) there

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!