28.04.2016 Views

Ambulance

21hiRF8

21hiRF8

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Focus on Global Traffic Technologies<br />

Seeing the Lights: the Traffic Signal<br />

Technology that can Save Time and Lives<br />

Tim Hall, market and development director at Global Traffic Technologies, looks at the<br />

history and technology behind the traffic systems that allow ambulances to respond to<br />

incidents more swiftly and safely<br />

When an emergency vehicle arrives at a<br />

traffic intersection, sirens blaring and lights<br />

flashing, the result can be a frightening<br />

disruption.<br />

Drivers suddenly realise they need<br />

to manoeuvre their cars to allow the<br />

emergency vehicle through. Some drivers<br />

panic, becoming confused and creating<br />

conflicts that can cause blocked lanes and<br />

emergency vehicle crashes, increasing<br />

response times.<br />

But intelligent transportation technologies<br />

that provide emergency vehicles with<br />

a green light at intersections can help<br />

minimise driver confusion, reduce collisions,<br />

and improve emergency response times.<br />

This is an emergency vehicle preemption<br />

system, or EVP. EVP systems are designed<br />

to give emergency vehicles a green light<br />

on their approach to an intersection<br />

while providing a red light to conflicting<br />

approaches.<br />

EVP systems are a simple but powerful<br />

solution that can rapidly and dramatically<br />

improve safety and response times.<br />

History of priority control systems<br />

Both Europe and North America adopted<br />

traffic light priority control in the 1960s, but<br />

developed the technology in contrasting<br />

directions.<br />

In North America, the first users of priority<br />

control were emergency services, including<br />

fire, police and ambulance companies. Public<br />

transport agencies did not take up the<br />

technology until the mid-1970s. In Europe,<br />

conversely, the public transport segment was<br />

the early adopter, followed by emergency<br />

service users.<br />

One reason for the difference is that in<br />

North America local police and fire chiefs<br />

controlled the procurement budgets<br />

for their agencies and were interested<br />

in supporting a dedicated EVP signalling<br />

system approach. Agencies in Europe at the<br />

time had a stronger focus on mass transit<br />

priority control using existing loop-based<br />

vehicle detection systems. These systems,<br />

however, were not suitable for emergency<br />

vehicle use.<br />

Another factor that may have delayed<br />

widespread introduction of emergency<br />

vehicle priority systems in the European<br />

region was the technology used to signal a<br />

preemption request to the intersection.<br />

At that time the most popular methods<br />

being used were strobe lamps, centrally<br />

activated green-corridors and sound<br />

based signalling. In North America the<br />

stroboscopic system emerged as the<br />

dominant technology. Sound-based systems<br />

had inconsistent performance, and there<br />

Similar technology is used for transit signal<br />

priority systems, which enable public<br />

transport agencies to extend or truncate<br />

green cycle times at traffic signals for more<br />

accurate schedule adherence. This means<br />

public transport vehicles — including buses,<br />

light rail trains, street cars, cable cars and<br />

trams — spend less time waiting, lowering<br />

fuel and fleet costs and reducing carbon<br />

emissions.<br />

Book your place at EMS2016 now at: www.ems2016.org<br />

64 Spring 2016 | <strong>Ambulance</strong>today

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!