16.05.2016 Views

100% Positive Material Identification

23mhiW2

23mhiW2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Editorial<br />

Understanding Implants in<br />

Knee and Hip Replacement<br />

An interview with<br />

Douglas E. Padgett, MD<br />

Chief of the Adult Reconstruction and Joint<br />

Replacement Division, Orthopedic Surgeon,<br />

Hospital for Special Surgery<br />

Information about knee and hip<br />

replacements is more easily available<br />

than ever before. But direct-toconsumer<br />

advertising, online articles and<br />

other reports in the media may make<br />

it more difficult for people considering<br />

these surgeries to understand their<br />

options. Becoming familiar with the key<br />

considerations that go into selection of<br />

the implant that is used to replace the<br />

injured or damaged joint can make the<br />

process easier.<br />

I<br />

Russell E. Windsor, MD, PC<br />

Orthopaedic Surgeon, Hospital for Special Surgery<br />

Figures 2a and b: Picture of Implant in Knee<br />

Figure 2c: X-ray<br />

of a Total Knee<br />

Arthroplasty<br />

Types of Knee Replacement<br />

In the majority of total knee<br />

Figure 1: Anatomy of the Knee Joint<br />

replacements, the surgeon places<br />

components of the implant (also called a<br />

prosthesis) on the joint surfaces of three bones that make up the knee joint: the femur,<br />

the long bone in the thigh, the tibia, the larger of the two bones in the lower leg and a<br />

patellar (kneecap) component, which glides on the femur, the bone that you feel at the<br />

front of the knee. The patellar component is sometimes not needed.<br />

Although there are now many different models of knee implants available from<br />

a number of different manufacturers, there are<br />

two primary types - one that substitutes for the<br />

posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), a central ligament<br />

that stabilizes the knee joint, and one that spares it.<br />

[Figure 1]<br />

“The choice between these two implants usually<br />

comes down to surgeon preference,” explains<br />

Russell E. Windsor, MD, Orthopedic Surgeon at<br />

the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS). “At HSS, the<br />

majority of surgeons prefer an implant that replaces<br />

the PCL.”<br />

In part, this preference is based on the<br />

pioneering work done at HSS by John Insall, MD,<br />

Chit Ranawat, MD and Peter Walker in 1973, the<br />

orthopedists and bioengineer who developed the total condylar prosthesis, designed<br />

to closely replicate the anatomy and functional characteristics of the knee joint.<br />

“This really marked the beginning of successful modern knee replacement,” says Dr.<br />

Windsor. Since that time thousands of successful surgeries have been completed using<br />

more modern, refined versions of this implant. But research also suggests that equally<br />

successful outcomes are achieved with implants that spare the PCL.<br />

“Prospective patients may also read or hear about fixed-bearing implants versus<br />

rotating platform implants, and wonder which one is preferable,” Dr. Windsor notes.<br />

These terms refer to the portion of the replacement that is attached to the tibia.<br />

When fixed-bearing implants are used, a metal component is inserted into the<br />

tibia and a polyethylene (plastic) tray is locked into place on top of it. [Figures 2a,b,c]<br />

TITANIUMTODAY 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!