14.06.2016 Views

Conference Report 2016

Table of contents contains links on page 5. It can be used to skip through chapters.

Table of contents contains links on page 5. It can be used to skip through chapters.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

fOREwORD<br />

In presenting this annual report to <strong>Conference</strong> I outline the current work being undertaken by the<br />

secretariat and the Central Executive Committee.<br />

The past year has presented a range of challenges to this Association. We had not yet exited the<br />

Haddington Road Agreement that has protected pay and allowances since 2013, when we were<br />

presented with a successive proposal in the form of the Lansdowne Road Agreement. Our<br />

membership resoundingly rejected this proposal by way of ballot. Given our difficult status within<br />

Irish industrial relations we were presented with a three-year proposal while still awaiting a full<br />

root-and-branch review of Garda industrial relations and Garda pay that was committed to by all<br />

the parties to the Haddington Road Agreement. We have fulfilled all of our commitments under<br />

that Agreement.<br />

We were not alone in rejecting the Lansdowne Road Agreement and yet uncertainty continues to<br />

exist as to the continued payment of increments once the existing Agreement expires. This,<br />

obviously, would negatively impact disproportionately on members of junior service. Bearing this<br />

in mind we are cognisant of developments emanating from the Department of Public Expenditure<br />

and Reform (DPER). We are mindful of the impact of DPER has had upon the lives of our members<br />

as in our failure by way of legal challenge to overturn the retrospective changes to our sickness<br />

regulations. This Department (DPER) has direct input into the pay and conditions of our members<br />

but affords us no opportunity to debate, discuss and negotiate or most importantly to directly<br />

represent our members. They are not directly accountable as our employers, yet they have direct<br />

management over the eligibility and payment of our wages.<br />

The pay and conditions of newly trained Gardaí have come under searing scrutiny. Public<br />

commendatory by politicians, academics and pundits is concluding that more Gardaí should be<br />

recruited immediately. The message is now broadly that the recruitment of new members is<br />

currently necessary and dispensing with the two-tier pay structures is a priority to avoid the<br />

discontent that historically arises from such disparity. The adoption of the latter concept shows<br />

how ill-served our members have been by the replacement of Social Partnership. Without a<br />

platform for engaging with the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform our members are<br />

denied the rights outlined and adopted by the Council of Europe. These rights apply from an<br />

industrial relations, social, civil and political perspective.<br />

The Review of An Garda Síochána established under the Haddington Road Agreement must<br />

focus on an ethical resolution as opposed to a legal analysis as a basis for our future industrial<br />

relations. The DPER may not have broken the law when retrospectively redefining our<br />

entitlements to sick pay – but that does not equate to it being fair or just. Sustainable change and<br />

modernisation is dependent upon the correct balance being achieved and being fairly<br />

implemented.<br />

This Association has had issues with recognition by Garda Management. Progress has been<br />

made. From March <strong>2016</strong>, Partnership has been replaced by a Joint Protocol for Consultation and<br />

Dispute Resolution. The latter provides a mechanism and timeframe for decisions to be made and<br />

appeals to be lodged. We are hopeful that this new concept will enable swift and expedient<br />

resolution of issues while enhancing our capability to impact the decisions of management.<br />

We have a relationship with government (Conciliation and Arbitration) that circumvents the<br />

oversight bodies and should allow us to influence wage agreements and policy decisions. This<br />

has been greatly diluted since the advent of the recession as the Conciliation and Arbitration<br />

Scheme became de facto redundant and the control of the Department of Justice and Equality<br />

has waned.<br />

38th Annual Delegate <strong>Conference</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!