SENATE
2e7N9wg
2e7N9wg
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Thursday, 13 October 2016 <strong>SENATE</strong> 37<br />
BILLS<br />
National Cancer Screening Register Bill 2016<br />
National Cancer Screening Register (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2016<br />
Second Reading<br />
Consideration resumed of the motion:<br />
That these bills be now read a second time.<br />
to which the following amendment was moved:<br />
At the end of the motion, add:<br />
", but the Senate condemns the Government for outsourcing Australians' most sensitive health information to Telstra before<br />
the Parliament even saw the necessary legislation.".<br />
Senator GRIFF (South Australia) (12:42): This is not my first speech. I rise to speak very briefly on this<br />
package of reforms and to indicate the Nick Xenophon Team's in-principle support for this package. Establishing<br />
a national register should go a long way towards reducing duplication and unnecessary red tape across<br />
jurisdictions and, more importantly, assisting with the management of bowel and cervical cancer screening<br />
programs.<br />
These bills, the National Cancer Screening Register Bill 2016 and the National Cancer Screening Register<br />
(Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2016, certainly have not been without criticism, but this is less to<br />
do with the underlying policy objectives and more to do with the contentious nature of the tender process that<br />
preceded them. The fact that the government chose to enter into a $220 million contract with Telstra Health prior<br />
to the passage of the enabling legislation demonstrates a complete disregard for the important role of this place in<br />
the legislative process and in ensuring transparency and accountability. Given the nature of the data that will be<br />
maintained in the national register, there are a multitude of privacy considerations that ought to have been<br />
considered before the awarding of the tender, particularly when the tenderer is a non-government entity. These<br />
criticisms, amongst others, have to a large extent formed the basis of the inquiry by the Senate Community Affairs<br />
Legislation Committee. That committee process has certainly been worthwhile in fleshing out these concerns. At<br />
the very least, we now have a redacted contract that we can also refer to for further consideration and clarification.<br />
In terms of amendments, the opposition has indicated it intends to proceed with its proposal to restrict the<br />
operation of the register to a government agency or not-for-profit organisation. It claims Telstra Health does not<br />
have the requisite expertise to adequately manage the sort of sensitive data that would be kept on the register. I<br />
indicate for the record that the Nick Xenophon Team will not be supporting that proposal. However, I indicate that<br />
my colleague Senator Xenophon will also be moving a second reading amendment aimed at addressing at least<br />
some of the concerns around the tender process. That amendment will not prevent the passage or implementation<br />
of the bill but it will request that the Auditor-General undertake a review that looks at issues of value for money<br />
and efficiency in the contract. It is important to point out that the amendment does not require the minister to<br />
direct the Auditor-General—and the advice I have is that it is quite appropriate for the parliament to refer<br />
matters—<br />
The ACTING DEPUTY PRESIDENT (Senator Reynolds): Senator Griff, it being 12:45, we will now move<br />
to government business, and you will be in continuation.<br />
International Tax Agreements Amendment Bill 2016<br />
First Reading<br />
Bill received from the House of Representatives.<br />
Senator RYAN (Victoria—Special Minister of State and Minister Assisting the Cabinet Secretary) (12:45): I<br />
move:<br />
That this bill may proceed without formalities and be now read a first time.<br />
Question agreed to.<br />
Bill read a first time.<br />
Senator RYAN: by leave—I move:<br />
That the provisions of paragraphs (5) to (8) of standing order 111 not apply to the bill, allowing it to be considered during<br />
this period of sittings.<br />
I table a statement of reasons justifying the need for this bill to be considered during these sittings and seek leave<br />
to have the statement incorporated into Hansard.<br />
Leave granted.<br />
CHAMBER