13.10.2016 Views

SENATE

2e7N9wg

2e7N9wg

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

68 <strong>SENATE</strong> Thursday, 13 October 2016<br />

QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS<br />

Attorney-General<br />

Royal Commission into the Child Protection and Youth Detention Systems of the Northern<br />

Territory<br />

Senator BRANDIS (Queensland—Attorney-General, Vice-President of the Executive Council and Leader of<br />

the Government in the Senate) (15:04): I have additional information to provide in relation to two questions I was<br />

asked earlier in the week. Yesterday Senator Sterle asked me questions without notice regarding the resignation of<br />

Mr Brian Martin as Royal Commissioner into the Child Protection and Youth Detention Systems of the Northern<br />

Territory. As I said in my press conference on Monday, 1 August, and as I told the chamber yesterday, Mr Martin<br />

told me on the morning of Saturday, 30 July, of his wish to resign. The transcript of my press conference, which<br />

has been online since 1 August 2016, the day of the press conference, begins with me saying that. The original<br />

transcript, issued by my office, was drawn from a live captions service, tveeder, which did not include the opening<br />

remarks of the press conference. When my office was made aware of the fact, the full audio was immediately<br />

checked, and the transcript was amended and published online. As I said, it has been online since 1 August.<br />

I can also confirm that, following Mr Martin's indication to me on the Saturday morning of his wish to resign,<br />

the Administrator of the Commonwealth, in Executive Council attended by Senator McGrath and me on the<br />

afternoon of 1 August, revoked Mr Martin's letters patent as royal commissioner and issued letters patent to<br />

Justice Margaret White and Mr Mick Gooda to serve as royal commissioners.<br />

As well, on Tuesday Senator Gallacher asked me about consultation with Mr Mick Gooda, and I provided<br />

certain information to the Senate. As well as that, at my request, one of my senior advisers, Dr Susan Cochrane,<br />

also contacted Mick Gooda and spoke to him for approximately 45 minutes in order to seek his views, and she<br />

reported those views to me. So Mr Gooda was consulted both by me and, at greater length, by Dr Cochrane.<br />

Senator GALLAGHER (Australian Capital Territory—Manager of Opposition Business in the Senate)<br />

(15:07): In relation to the Attorney-General's follow-up on questions taken on notice during question time this<br />

week, I also asked a question this week about when the Solicitor-General first sighted the legal direction,<br />

including the reference to section 10B, the new insertion of section 10B; on what day was he made aware of that;<br />

when did he first sight it; and whether he was given the opportunity to consult or provide feedback. I am just<br />

following up on whether there might be an answer to that question.<br />

Senator BRANDIS (Queensland—Attorney-General, Vice-President of the Executive Council and Leader of<br />

the Government in the Senate) (15:07): Not at the moment, Senator, because I have not made that inquiry yet. By<br />

the way, Senator, if my memory serves me correctly, I did answer part of that question. What I took on notice was<br />

the first of the two matters that you have referred to.<br />

Medicinal Marijuana<br />

Health Care: World Mental Health Day<br />

Senator NASH (New South Wales—Deputy Leader of The Nationals, Minister for Regional Development,<br />

Minister for Local Government and Territories and Minister for Regional Communications) (15:08): I rise to table<br />

my responses to questions taken on notice on Monday to Senator Hanson and also to Senator Siewert. I seek leave<br />

to incorporate those responses.<br />

The answers read as follows—<br />

Response to Question without notice from Senator Hanson — Monday 10 October:<br />

The Australian Government's decision has been to regulate medicinal cannabis products as therapeutic goods. There are<br />

constitutional limits to the extent that the Commonwealth can regulate therapeutic goods. All therapeutic goods are subject to<br />

both Commonwealth and state/territory legislation.<br />

In the case of medicinal cannabis products, some states, such as Queensland and Victoria, have decided to introduce or<br />

enact new legislation to facilitate access to these products. Other states have determined that there is no need to change their<br />

legislation.<br />

This is a matter for state governments to decide. In Queensland, access to medicinal cannabis products was absolutely<br />

prohibited until December 2015, regardless of any decisions at the Commonwealth level. In December 2015, the Queensland<br />

government made changes to their regulations to enable, for the first time, access to medicinal cannabis products.<br />

The Commonwealth has no power to directly intercede and overrule the state governments and so is working with them to<br />

ensure, as much as possible, a harmonised approach.<br />

The recent decision by the Therapeutic Goods Administration to schedule medicinal cannabis products to schedule 8 of the<br />

Poisons Standard under certain circumstances is intended to facilitate state/territory laws around medicinal cannabis products.<br />

CHAMBER<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!