11.12.2016 Views

cities

SoCR16-Main-Report-online

SoCR16-Main-Report-online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 7.10: Bad debt per city (2010–2014)<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

Rand (billions)<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

JHB CPT ETH TSH EKH NMB MAN BUFF MSU<br />

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014<br />

South African <strong>cities</strong> also have to deal with the high social, financial and environment costs that are the<br />

result of apartheid spatial planning, which produced sprawling, low-density <strong>cities</strong> characterised by<br />

inefficient land use and distribution, where the “poor are typically located on the urban periphery”<br />

with “little access to housing and services” (FFC, 2011: 170). A recent study on the costs of sprawl in<br />

American <strong>cities</strong> estimated that the costs of energy use, road accidents, congestion and emissions<br />

amount to US$1-trillion per year (Litman, 2015). This is equal to approximately US$4556 per capita<br />

per year, of which US$2568 is a cost to households and US$1988 is carried by other people, such as<br />

the municipality or insurers.<br />

A South African analysis found that housing and infrastructure costs for households were lower in<br />

peripheral neighbourhoods, encouraging investment decisions that increased urban sprawl (Biermann,<br />

2006). However, at city-scale, sprawl results in significant additional costs, from installing and<br />

maintaining infrastructure for water and sanitation and other municipal services, to ongoing operating<br />

costs associated with providing services, such as waste management and community safety, in a<br />

dispersed geographic area.<br />

Cities can unlock direct savings and reap wider benefits by encouraging a shift from private vehicles<br />

to public transport. The Rea Vaya BRT service in Johannesburg has resulted in an overall saving of<br />

over US$890-million (Gouldson et al., 2015). The key savings are a result of the reduced travel<br />

times and increased road safety, with lower greenhouse gas emissions contributing to about 10%<br />

of the savings.<br />

A better understanding is needed of the systemic cost savings that can be achieved through spatial<br />

transformation, so that a case can be made for assertive spatial transformation policy and programmes<br />

funded through municipal revenue or intergovernmental transfers.<br />

258 State of South African Cities Report 2016

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!