01.03.2017 Views

MAPPING CULTURE

Mapping-Culture-Venues-and-Infrastructure-in-the-City-of-Sydney

Mapping-Culture-Venues-and-Infrastructure-in-the-City-of-Sydney

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

government/non-government, and location. Thanks to a user-friendly form builder<br />

(JotForm), a mapping tool has been added to the questionnaire in order to<br />

engineer the attribution of geocoded information to the crowdsourced data (the<br />

discussion and evaluation of the crowdsourcing survey are outlined in Section 8).<br />

Questionnaire responses > database > 秜ᇘ nal map<br />

The final database, comprising FES data along with lists of venues compiled from<br />

other surveys, is essential for export to a consolidated ArcGIS file. The database<br />

allows for other kinds of data manipulation and analysis, including the brief<br />

summaries by spatial and value chain categories outlined in Section 5 and more<br />

detailed case study exemplified in Section 6. The full list of data sources used for the<br />

compilation of the master database is provided in Appendix 4.<br />

4.3 From GIS to GeoViz<br />

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are software that allow researchers to<br />

manage geographic data and display results on a map. From its inception in the late<br />

1960s in Canada (Foresman, 1998), GIS science has become a widely used epistemic<br />

tool to research and understand territorial patterns and connections. Various<br />

proprietary and open-source devices are now available, and it is common for local<br />

administrations to use such tools for urban planning purposes, as well as for other<br />

functions that require us to visualise data on a map.<br />

However, from the very beginning many pointed out the limits of purely quantitative<br />

research and visualisations based on GIS (Goodchild, 1988; Couclelis, 2003). In more<br />

recent years, GIS experts have addressed this drawback in various ways, conceiving<br />

research practices based on a mix of qualitative and quantitative geographic<br />

information, or based on forms of engagement, like the participatory GIS (Rambaldi<br />

et al., 2005) that allow a wider variety of data to be represented on the same<br />

platform. Despite these advancements, research still shows that GIS tools are based<br />

on very specific forms of software expertise that make it difficult to communicate<br />

geographic information, both internally for policy making purposes, and externally<br />

as a tool of public engagement (Elwood, 2006).<br />

On the other hand, the liberalisation of GPS technology (satellite geopositioning<br />

system), the birth of Yahoo! Maps, Google Maps, and the phenomenon of Volunteer<br />

Geographic Information (VGI) (Goodchild, 2007) highlight an increasing public<br />

familiarity with mapping devices and maps themselves that goes far beyond the<br />

domain of professional cartographic expertise. For these reasons, researchers like<br />

Jacques Bertin (1983) and Alan MacEachren (MacEachren and Kraak, 2001) have<br />

suggested that the concept of Geographic Visualisation might advance the<br />

possibilities of GIS itself, by combining it with more interactive, user-friendly maps<br />

and other visualisations and trends in the field of VGI.<br />

54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!