06.03.2017 Views

Mathematics for Computer Science

e9ck2Ar

e9ck2Ar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

“mcs” — 2017/3/3 — 11:21 — page 304 — #312<br />

304<br />

Chapter 9<br />

Number Theory<br />

9.4 The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic<br />

There is an important fact about primes that you probably already know: every<br />

positive integer number has a unique prime factorization. So every positive integer<br />

can be built up from primes in exactly one way. These quirky prime numbers are<br />

the building blocks <strong>for</strong> the integers.<br />

Since the value of a product of numbers is the same if the numbers appear in a<br />

different order, there usually isn’t a unique way to express a number as a product<br />

of primes. For example, there are three ways to write 12 as a product of primes:<br />

12 D 2 2 3 D 2 3 2 D 3 2 2:<br />

What’s unique about the prime factorization of 12 is that any product of primes<br />

equal to 12 will have exactly one 3 and two 2’s. This means that if we sort the<br />

primes by size, then the product really will be unique.<br />

Let’s state this more carefully. A sequence of numbers is weakly decreasing<br />

when each number in the sequence is at least as big as the numbers after it. Note<br />

that a sequence of just one number as well as a sequence of no numbers—the empty<br />

sequence—is weakly decreasing by this definition.<br />

Theorem 9.4.1. [Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic] Every positive integer is a<br />

product of a unique weakly decreasing sequence of primes.<br />

For example, 75237393 is the product of the weakly decreasing sequence of<br />

primes<br />

23; 17; 17; 11; 7; 7; 7; 3;<br />

and no other weakly decreasing sequence of primes will give 75237393. 8<br />

Notice that the theorem would be false if 1 were considered a prime; <strong>for</strong> example,<br />

15 could be written as 5 3, or 5 3 1, or 5 3 1 1, . . . .<br />

There is a certain wonder in unique factorization, especially in view of the prime<br />

number mysteries we’ve already mentioned. It’s a mistake to take it <strong>for</strong> granted,<br />

even if you’ve known it since you were in a crib. In fact, unique factorization<br />

actually fails <strong>for</strong> many integer-like sets of numbers, such as the complex numbers<br />

of the <strong>for</strong>m n C m p 5 <strong>for</strong> m; n 2 Z (see Problem 9.25).<br />

The Fundamental Theorem is also called the Unique Factorization Theorem,<br />

which is a more descriptive and less pretentious, name—but we really want to get<br />

your attention to the importance and non-obviousness of unique factorization.<br />

8 The “product” of just one number is defined to be that number, and the product of no numbers is<br />

by convention defined to be 1. So each prime p is uniquely the product of the primes in the lengthone<br />

sequence consisting solely of p, and 1, which you will remember is not a prime, is uniquely the<br />

product of the empty sequence.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!