06.03.2017 Views

Mathematics for Computer Science

e9ck2Ar

e9ck2Ar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

“mcs” — 2017/3/3 — 11:21 — page 34 — #42<br />

34<br />

Chapter 2<br />

The Well Ordering Principle<br />

Definition 2.4.2. A lower bound (respectively, upper bound) <strong>for</strong> a set S of real<br />

numbers is a number b such that b s (respectively, b s) <strong>for</strong> every s 2 S.<br />

Note that a lower or upper bound of set S is not required to be in the set.<br />

Corollary 2.4.3. Any set of integers with a lower bound is well ordered.<br />

Proof. A set of integers with a lower bound b 2 R will also have the integer n D<br />

bbc as a lower bound, where bbc, called the floor of b, is gotten by rounding down<br />

b to the nearest integer. So Theorem 2.4.1 implies the set is well ordered. <br />

Corollary 2.4.4. Any nonempty set of integers with an upper bound has a maximum<br />

element.<br />

Proof. Suppose a set S of integers has an upper bound b 2 R. Now multiply each<br />

element of S by -1; let’s call this new set of elements S. Now, of course, b is a<br />

lower bound of S. So S has a minimum element m by Corollary 2.4.3. But<br />

then it’s easy to see that m is the maximum element of S.<br />

<br />

2.4.1 A Different Well Ordered Set (Optional)<br />

Another example of a well ordered set of numbers is the set F of fractions that can<br />

be expressed in the <strong>for</strong>m n=.n C 1/:<br />

0<br />

1 ; 1 2 ; 2 3 ; 3 4 ; : : : ; n<br />

n C 1 ; : : : :<br />

The minimum element of any nonempty subset of F is simply the one with the<br />

minimum numerator when expressed in the <strong>for</strong>m n=.n C 1/.<br />

Now we can define a very different well ordered set by adding nonnegative integers<br />

to numbers in F. That is, we take all the numbers of the <strong>for</strong>m n C f where n is<br />

a nonnegative integer and f is a number in F. Let’s call this set of numbers—you<br />

guessed it—N C F. There is a simple recipe <strong>for</strong> finding the minimum number in<br />

any nonempty subset of N C F, which explains why this set is well ordered:<br />

Lemma 2.4.5. N C F is well ordered.<br />

Proof. Given any nonempty subset S of N C F, look at all the nonnegative integers<br />

n such that n C f is in S <strong>for</strong> some f 2 F. This is a nonempty set nonnegative<br />

integers, so by the WOP, there is a minimum one; call it n s .<br />

By definition of n s , there is some f 2 F such that n S C f is in the set S. So<br />

the set all fractions f such that n S C f 2 S is a nonempty subset of F, and since<br />

F is well ordered, this nonempty set contains a minimum element; call it f S . Now<br />

it easy to verify that n S C f S is the minimum element of S (Problem 2.19).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!