06.03.2017 Views

Mathematics for Computer Science

e9ck2Ar

e9ck2Ar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

“mcs” — 2017/3/3 — 11:21 — page 775 — #783<br />

18.9. Probability versus Confidence 775<br />

This shows that after flipping one hundred heads, the odds that the biased coin was<br />

chosen are overwhelming, and so with high probability the next flip will be a Head.<br />

Thus, by assuming some tiny probability <strong>for</strong> the coin being heavily biased toward<br />

Heads, we can justify our intuition that after one hundred consecutive Heads, the<br />

next flip is very likely to be a Head.<br />

Making an assumption about the probability that some unverified fact is true is<br />

known as the Bayesian approach to a hypthesis testing problem. By granting a tiny<br />

probability that the biased coin was being flipped, this Bayesian approach provided<br />

a reasonable justification <strong>for</strong> estimating that the odds of a Head on the next flip are<br />

ninety-nine to one in favor.<br />

18.9.5 Confidence in the Next Flip<br />

If we stick to confidence rather than probability, we don’t need to make any Bayesian<br />

assumptions about the probability of a fair coin. We know that if one hundred<br />

Heads are flipped, then either the coin is biased, or something that virtually never<br />

happens (probability 2 100 ) has occurred. That means we can assert that the coin<br />

is biased at the 1 2 100 confidence level. In short, when one hundred Heads are<br />

flipped, we can be essentially 100% confident that the coin is biased.<br />

Problems <strong>for</strong> Section 18.4<br />

Homework Problems<br />

Problem 18.1.<br />

The Conditional Probability Product Rule <strong>for</strong> n Events is<br />

Rule.<br />

PrŒE 1 \ E 2 \ : : : \ E n D PrŒE 1 Pr E 2 j E 1<br />

<br />

Pr<br />

<br />

E3 j E 1 \ E 2<br />

<br />

<br />

(a) Restate the Rule without using elipses (. . . ).<br />

(b) Prove it by induction.<br />

Pr E n j E 1 \ E 2 \ : : : \ E n 1<br />

<br />

:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!