15.03.2017 Views

Thesis 100dpi

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

he will receive the rights granted to those with refugee<br />

status. Having no legitimate refugee status inter alia<br />

means the displaced person cannot obtain a refugee<br />

travel document, and must remain in a country without<br />

the ability to move freely.<br />

2. PROTECTION<br />

Travel document<br />

Refugees are unlikely to be<br />

able to obtain passports<br />

from their state of nationality<br />

(from which they have<br />

sought asylum) and therefore<br />

need travel documents<br />

so that they might engage<br />

in international travel.<br />

The 145 states which are<br />

parties to the 1951 Convention<br />

Relating to the Status<br />

of Refugees are obliged to<br />

issue travel documents to<br />

refugees lawfully resident<br />

in their territory.<br />

“No Contracting State shall expel or return (‘refouler’)<br />

a refugee in any manner whatsoever to the frontiers of<br />

territories where his life or freedom would be threatened<br />

on account of his race, religion, nationality, membership<br />

of a particular social group of political opinion.”<br />

One of the rights of refugee status is that of “non-refoulement”,<br />

or non-return. Host countries are not allowed<br />

to return refugees or asylum seekers to a country<br />

where they are liable to be subjected to persecution.<br />

However, non-refoulement requires host countries only<br />

to protect the displaced person from coming to harm<br />

while inside its borders, with no obligation to assist the<br />

person. It allows host countries to only grant temporary<br />

shelter that can be revoked when it is decided the refugees<br />

can go home.<br />

When introducing the draft of the Geneva Convention<br />

some 65 years ago, the UN’s first Secretary General<br />

explained that “[t]his phase... will be characterized by<br />

the fact that the refugees will lead an independent life<br />

in the countries which have given them shelter. With the<br />

exception of the ‘hard core’ cases, the refugees will no<br />

longer be maintained by an international organization<br />

as they are at present. They will be integrated in the<br />

economic system of the countries of asylum and will<br />

themselves provide for their own needs and for those of<br />

their families.” This means refugees are granted social<br />

and economic rights that allow them to, for example,<br />

access education, to seek work and to start businesses.<br />

However, in practice the situation is quite different:<br />

most refugees today are not living independently and<br />

are maintained by international aid organizations. Most<br />

refugees today are emphatically not allowed to provide<br />

for their own needs. They do not enjoy the ability to<br />

move freely, as they are sentenced to refugee camps.<br />

This situation is a clear violation of a right as granted to<br />

them under international law.<br />

Being ‘‘caged up’’ is unlawful and counterproductive,<br />

making the refugees burdens of their hosts and the<br />

international community. There is little possibility of<br />

integrating into the new society, and the chances are<br />

even slimmer for resettling or even returning home. The<br />

Geneva Convention itself rejects a charity-based model<br />

in favor of refugee empowerment.<br />

In case of a refugee individual or a group reasonably<br />

suspected of being a criminal and a threat to their safety<br />

or security, it requires the exclusion from refugee status<br />

and sending them away – even back to the country of<br />

persecution .<br />

3. INTERNATIONAL LAW<br />

Whether or not the mandates of the Geneva Convention<br />

will apply in a specific country depends on whether the<br />

country has ratified. This becomes very important if we<br />

concentrate on the ongoing Syrian crisis.<br />

None of the people who fled to Lebanon, Jordan and<br />

Iraq have a legal right to be recognized as refugees because<br />

these countries are not signatories to the Geneva<br />

Convention. Turkey, on the other hand, did ratify the<br />

original Convention, but made an important exception<br />

with the 1967 Protocol. Turkey did not accept the erasure<br />

of regional exceptions – it agreed only to continue<br />

to accept refugees from the Council of Europe. So technically,<br />

Turkey recognizes only the original Convention<br />

referring to Europe, and can only grant refugee status to<br />

Europeans. Thus, people fleeing from Syria or elsewhere<br />

into Turkey have no right to be recognized as refugees.<br />

In the end, the perspective from Europe is that the<br />

Middle East region is filled with refugees who become<br />

migrants once they cross into Europe. This view seems<br />

to miss the point that the region is filled with desperate<br />

people who only have the chance to become refugees<br />

once they cross into Europe, regardless of what they will<br />

do afterwards.<br />

81 DANGEROUS JOURNEY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!