Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
he will receive the rights granted to those with refugee<br />
status. Having no legitimate refugee status inter alia<br />
means the displaced person cannot obtain a refugee<br />
travel document, and must remain in a country without<br />
the ability to move freely.<br />
2. PROTECTION<br />
Travel document<br />
Refugees are unlikely to be<br />
able to obtain passports<br />
from their state of nationality<br />
(from which they have<br />
sought asylum) and therefore<br />
need travel documents<br />
so that they might engage<br />
in international travel.<br />
The 145 states which are<br />
parties to the 1951 Convention<br />
Relating to the Status<br />
of Refugees are obliged to<br />
issue travel documents to<br />
refugees lawfully resident<br />
in their territory.<br />
“No Contracting State shall expel or return (‘refouler’)<br />
a refugee in any manner whatsoever to the frontiers of<br />
territories where his life or freedom would be threatened<br />
on account of his race, religion, nationality, membership<br />
of a particular social group of political opinion.”<br />
One of the rights of refugee status is that of “non-refoulement”,<br />
or non-return. Host countries are not allowed<br />
to return refugees or asylum seekers to a country<br />
where they are liable to be subjected to persecution.<br />
However, non-refoulement requires host countries only<br />
to protect the displaced person from coming to harm<br />
while inside its borders, with no obligation to assist the<br />
person. It allows host countries to only grant temporary<br />
shelter that can be revoked when it is decided the refugees<br />
can go home.<br />
When introducing the draft of the Geneva Convention<br />
some 65 years ago, the UN’s first Secretary General<br />
explained that “[t]his phase... will be characterized by<br />
the fact that the refugees will lead an independent life<br />
in the countries which have given them shelter. With the<br />
exception of the ‘hard core’ cases, the refugees will no<br />
longer be maintained by an international organization<br />
as they are at present. They will be integrated in the<br />
economic system of the countries of asylum and will<br />
themselves provide for their own needs and for those of<br />
their families.” This means refugees are granted social<br />
and economic rights that allow them to, for example,<br />
access education, to seek work and to start businesses.<br />
However, in practice the situation is quite different:<br />
most refugees today are not living independently and<br />
are maintained by international aid organizations. Most<br />
refugees today are emphatically not allowed to provide<br />
for their own needs. They do not enjoy the ability to<br />
move freely, as they are sentenced to refugee camps.<br />
This situation is a clear violation of a right as granted to<br />
them under international law.<br />
Being ‘‘caged up’’ is unlawful and counterproductive,<br />
making the refugees burdens of their hosts and the<br />
international community. There is little possibility of<br />
integrating into the new society, and the chances are<br />
even slimmer for resettling or even returning home. The<br />
Geneva Convention itself rejects a charity-based model<br />
in favor of refugee empowerment.<br />
In case of a refugee individual or a group reasonably<br />
suspected of being a criminal and a threat to their safety<br />
or security, it requires the exclusion from refugee status<br />
and sending them away – even back to the country of<br />
persecution .<br />
3. INTERNATIONAL LAW<br />
Whether or not the mandates of the Geneva Convention<br />
will apply in a specific country depends on whether the<br />
country has ratified. This becomes very important if we<br />
concentrate on the ongoing Syrian crisis.<br />
None of the people who fled to Lebanon, Jordan and<br />
Iraq have a legal right to be recognized as refugees because<br />
these countries are not signatories to the Geneva<br />
Convention. Turkey, on the other hand, did ratify the<br />
original Convention, but made an important exception<br />
with the 1967 Protocol. Turkey did not accept the erasure<br />
of regional exceptions – it agreed only to continue<br />
to accept refugees from the Council of Europe. So technically,<br />
Turkey recognizes only the original Convention<br />
referring to Europe, and can only grant refugee status to<br />
Europeans. Thus, people fleeing from Syria or elsewhere<br />
into Turkey have no right to be recognized as refugees.<br />
In the end, the perspective from Europe is that the<br />
Middle East region is filled with refugees who become<br />
migrants once they cross into Europe. This view seems<br />
to miss the point that the region is filled with desperate<br />
people who only have the chance to become refugees<br />
once they cross into Europe, regardless of what they will<br />
do afterwards.<br />
81 DANGEROUS JOURNEY