25.04.2017 Views

5

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

338 NOTES.<br />

tive Pkhatachslgn'iCiespie.coloured, variegated OTpainted.<br />

Vichat<br />

sometimes written Viche and Vighe, is synonimous with the Ro.<br />

man Pica.<br />

The Irish Cruineachl, the Gaelic Pichatach, (gene,<br />

rally abbreviated Fichtach,) and the Roman Picii, have the same<br />

signification, and nothing more is necessary to support this etymology,<br />

than to prove that the Picts painted themselves. But<br />

Mr. Pinkarton has rendered this unnecessary, as he reckons the<br />

Pictish custom of painting themselves the very quintessence of<br />

their claim to a Gothic origin. See vol. 1. p. 126. As to the<br />

name Scot, it is evidently the Gaelic Scauth, signifying a swarm<br />

or cofony, and hence figuratively an exile, fugitive, or wanderer.<br />

Scaoth is diflferently pronounced Skyth, Skyt and Scut. It is<br />

evidently the same with the Greek Slcythai, and the Roman<br />

Scyihae.<br />

That the ancient Scythians were a migratory people,<br />

Mho subsisted by pasturage and hunting, is so universally allow,<br />

ed, that it is unnecessary to prove it. But it would be in vaia<br />

io look for the etymon of the Scythians in the Greek or Roman<br />

languages, whilst in the Celtic the radical meaning is still retained.<br />

Is it not therefore most probable that the Scythian Ian.<br />

guage was a dialect of the Celtic?<br />

Mr. Pinkarton is fully aware<br />

of this objection, and provides against it by telling us the Scots<br />

were Scythians, but learned the Celtic language after their arri.<br />

»al in Ireland.<br />

From what authority he procured this informa.<br />

tion, he has not informed us, and it therefore rests on his mere<br />

assertion.<br />

The name Vict and Scot are nearly coeval. Had the Picts<br />

brought their name with them from Scandinavia, three centuries<br />

before our aera, Tacitus would not, in the first century have<br />

called them Caledonii.<br />

But the truth appears to be, that in the<br />

third century a new nation, (the Scots from Ireland), came ia<br />

contact with the Romans, and that nation<br />

which, before the arrival<br />

of this colony in Argyleshire, was denominated<br />

was now divided into Victs and Scots,<br />

Caledonii^<br />

It is really pitiful to see<br />

the shifts Mr. Pinkarton is obliged to have recourse to. He<br />

calls Scot, (vol. 1. p. 366.) the little zcord Scot, not recollecting<br />

that his own favourite word P«A is at least one letter less.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!