25.04.2017 Views

5

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

386 ISfOTES,<br />

nitjr of the Celtic language to the Roman, that the Celts derived<br />

their letters, books, writing, reading, chronology, numbers, and<br />

the art of calculating, from St. Patrick, it must follow from the<br />

Tery same argument, that the Indian Bramins also derived the<br />

art of writing, &c. from St. Patrick, which is impossible.<br />

That the Celtic, Sanscrit, and Roman languages bear the<br />

strongest marks of affinity, is self-evident. Mr. Innes (and he<br />

has been too generally followed) endeavours to shew that the<br />

Celtic has borrowed largely from the Latin.<br />

Were we even to<br />

grant this postulatum, we are only involving ourselves in a new<br />

difficulty, for the affinity of the Sanscrit to the Latin remains<br />

still to be accounted for. I flatter myself the boldest speculator<br />

will not even venture to insinuate that the Sanscrit has borrowed<br />

from the Latin, or vice versa. These languages never came in<br />

contact. The Celtic cannot, therefore, have derif^ed its affinity<br />

to the Sanscrit through the medium of the Roman language. It<br />

is, on all hands, allowed that the Sanscrit and Celtic are Asiatic<br />

languages, or (in other words^ primary dialects of the aboriginal<br />

language of Asia. The Roman language has no such early<br />

claim. Fortunately for our present purpose, Rome reared its<br />

head within the period of authentic history.<br />

The Romans were<br />

not (like the Celts or Bramins) acolony direct from Asia. They<br />

were a few Italian shepherds, and lawless banditti, and could<br />

not possibly speak any other language than that of the country<br />

which produced. them. That the Celtic was the aboriginal Ian.<br />

guage of Europe, is a point unquestioned and unquestionable.<br />

It is even sanctioned by Pinkarton himself. The Celtic or Um.<br />

brian language was, therefore, the aboriginal language of Italy,<br />

and consequently of Rome. The Greek colonies, which, from<br />

time to time, settled in Italy prior to the Roman xra, do doubt<br />

effected some alteration in the language of Italy ; and it is most<br />

probable that the Doric dialect of the Greek, fotinded on the<br />

Celtic, or (in other words) the Celtic Doricizcd, laid the founda.<br />

lion of the Roman language. Hence the affinity of the Celtic,<br />

Sanscrit, and Roman languages, can be satisfactorily accounted<br />

for.<br />

The CeUic and Sanscrit were primary dialects of the abo.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!